BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > logout too easily and fast?
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
Game clock bugs
2
assist
3
Laggy
11
confusing time
2
Driving?
1
replace staff
2
[bug] team stats
3
logout too easily and fast?
21
does anyone else get this?
2
Playoff Money
33
League Records
9
How do I get a game report?
5
$$$ for position
2
How did i lose this game?
8
Player Names?
3
PR-Guy?
7
BB on OMGN
1
0-25 FT Shooter
3
Arena name gone
2
How to return to home page?
2
<
>
Favorite Folders
logout too easily and fast?
(thread closed)
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
BB-Charles (1)
stogey23 (1)
CrewDust (1)
raonne (5)
LA-Niko (4)
bull7 (2)
dudave (1)
nickfox45 (5)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
bull7
To:
johny13
This Post:
0
571.2
in reply to
571.1
Date: 7/31/2007 1:42:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
15
Exactly the same problem for me!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
raonne
To:
bull7
This Post:
0
571.3
in reply to
571.2
Date: 7/31/2007 8:10:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16
yes, the session timeout time is too short. I fully agree with you guys it's terrible.
Happens all the time also when I'm writing a longer post on the forums or translating a big paragraph of the rules page.
We need more time Charles !!!
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
dudave
To:
raonne
This Post:
0
571.4
in reply to
571.3
Date: 8/1/2007 5:06:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
yes it is way too short, it can become very anoying sometimes
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
stogey23
To:
dudave
This Post:
0
571.5
in reply to
571.4
Date: 8/1/2007 7:08:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Let me also add to this.
Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
CrewDust
To:
stogey23
This Post:
0
571.6
in reply to
571.5
Date: 8/4/2007 3:19:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1
I also endorse this message.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
bull7
To:
BB-Charles
This Post:
0
571.8
in reply to
571.7
Date: 8/5/2007 5:04:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
15
I have the impression that it is less...but I think 45 minutes would be good.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
raonne
To:
bull7
This Post:
0
571.9
in reply to
571.8
Date: 8/5/2007 5:25:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16
I feel like it's been less also. i'll run an experiment today to find out. but in any case 20 min is still pretty low.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
nickfox45
To:
raonne
This Post:
0
571.10
in reply to
571.9
Date: 9/27/2007 2:43:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
I think 20 minutes is fine. Do you really ever type a 20 minute long post in the conferences? It should only time you out if you've been inactive for that long, I think the problem is that it's not close to 20 minutes, which is why they're rewriting the forums at the moment.
I think 45 mins is pretty long, and just puts unnecessary strain on the server.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
raonne
To:
nickfox45
This Post:
0
571.11
in reply to
571.10
Date: 9/30/2007 2:55:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16
20 minutes is not fine. Not fine at all. And there is no need for me to say anything more about it, because the dozens of complaints about it in the forums since BB started speak for themselves.
The BB's even tried already to increase it to 40 min, but there is some sort of issue making that impossible, and they are still trying to overcome that.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
nickfox45
To:
raonne
This Post:
0
571.12
in reply to
571.11
Date: 9/30/2007 4:46:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
How can you say 20 mins is not fine? When has it ever taken you 20 minutes to make a single conference post? If it does, I think you may need some typing classes. ;)
You can't equate user complaints with 20 mins not being fine, since it currently very random, and somewhere in the range of 7-10 mins.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images