BuzzerBeater Forums

On your thursday scrimmage, your starter SG --> 6 PF.
On your last week scrimmage, your coach filled the court with your back ups at the beginning of the 4Q. If you choose "follow strictly...", there is a bug. It looks like a "Depth chart until 4th" behavior. I suggest you check your orders in the "former matches" drop down menu in "set your line up" so to make sure you didn't make any mistake.

i did double check again and in both cases i didnt make a misstake. i used strictly follow depth chart and the coach substituted at will...

On my last weeks saturday scrimmage game i put these players as my starters... And yes I used strcitly follow depth chart

starting pg: tavares no backup no reserve
starting sg: guardia no backup no reserve
starting sf: dey backup: lantz reserve: torres
starting pf: Yilong backup: mullan no reserve
starting c: Ebertz backup: breakwell no reserve

In my thursdays scrimmage I used strictly follow depth chart too and the coaching decisions were even more disastrous...

starting pg: Ortiz no backup no reserve
starting sg: McAvinchec no backup no reserve
starting sf: torres backup: dey reserve: torres
starting pf: Yilong backup: mullan no reserve
starting c: Ebertz backup: breakwell no reserve

like you i believe this is a bug too or an unanounced change in coach behaviour. (which I dont believe is the case) whatever it is, do BB developers read and act on these bug reports? Do i send this issue to a gm or directly to a BB developer? Any feedback from a GM or BB developer would be very welcome...

if you come to blowout torres will always play on the guard spot, because he is on the bench, and what should your coach do when someone gets his 6 fouls the sr won't let him play anymore.

* hides under the tables as fast as he can*

the first game i thought that might have happened. with regards to the second match i feel really totally incredible stupid... can someone pls close this thread? my god. how bloody stupid can someone be!!!

thanks for clearing it up...

do BB developers read and act on these bug reports?

Yep. That is pretty much the purpose of this forum.

It's more efficient to make public bug reports, as that allows users to see what has already been reported and for example share information on suspected bugs that in fact aren't bugs.

the first match i called it the 36+12 trick, search and easy opponent in scrimmage or when you have an bot in the cup you could easily arrange twelfe minutes for the backup :)

But i should stop taliking, because else this become to much ot and 2 this thread doesn't die^^