BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > The Benefits of Spending 40k on Scouting

The Benefits of Spending 40k on Scouting

Set priority
Show messages by
From: papag

This Post:
00
132117.20 in reply to 132117.19
Date: 2/22/2010 12:00:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
And a valid one at that. I really didn't scout that much last year, A. i started almost 2 thirds into the season and B. just left my scouting on 20k for most of the time. Last season i got to pick 9th in my league, i drafted the best player in the entire draft.

You can spend the 480K a season to get a little extra information, but in the end i doubt it will help you in the draft, especially if you play in an active league as many other players with better draft picks with you may scout the same players.

I have dont the 20k scouting all season and i'm second in the league, obviously i'm going to get a horrible draft pick but i'm hoping that i will still be able to draft a player i want.

remember that even if you draft a good player and wish to sell him, if you've done the 40k scouting and sell him for 500k you only make 20k. Not really worth drafting him in the first place when you could have just chanced it... instead you could save the 280k, and spend it on your arena or a better player, you can get a fairly decent player for about 300k (relative to your div).

But i understand that you may want to draft THE best player in the draft and maybe if you are coming last it might be a good idea to do the 40k scouting.... But it's not really worth it IMO

From: FresRez

This Post:
00
132117.21 in reply to 132117.12
Date: 2/22/2010 11:05:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
I am in a league with a bunch of bots. How well do these bot teams draft? Totally random? Or do the top picks still usually get the better players?

This Post:
00
132117.23 in reply to 132117.13
Date: 2/22/2010 11:40:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I treated such $40K a week for scouting as routie expenditure and consumed by spare money only, therefore it has not much impact on my team building. Besides, i also want to see the result if i keep doing in whole season, i think you guys wish to know too, just few weeks to go and i feel comfortable to pay for it.

The last but not the least, i still have the chance to get into relegation playoff with home advantage, the gate receipt is quite attractive in position 6th.

This Post:
00
132117.24 in reply to 132117.23
Date: 2/22/2010 1:49:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I think there's one important factor that hasn't been mentioned yet... what level your league is.

I am of the opinion that scouting is more important at the higher levels. Think about it; if you're a level IV team (as I am), are you really going to be able to draft a John Wall, no matter how much money you spend on scouting? Great players simply aren't available to you.

Of the players that are available to a league IV, the difference between the best and the worst is not that great. It certainly isn't worth $490K (the difference between spending $40K a week and $5K a week on scouting for a season). Heck, if you're IV, your entire team may not be worth $490K.

As a USA IV team, I'm considering cutting my scouting to $0 and buying all my prospects off the transfer list. Why not? Sure, I have to win a bidding war, and high potential drives the price way up. But I can pick the players with the exact positions and qualities I want, I'm not limited to Division IV players, I'm not limited to players from my own nation, and I'm not limited to (or forced to take) three players every year. And the draft creates a glut of castoffs, increased supply that lowers the cost of buying a player.

After three seasons, my best prospects have been guys I bought as transfers for small amounts of money -- less than even the $70K it costs to do minimum scouting for a year. The draft has given me almost nothing of value.

This Post:
00
132117.25 in reply to 132117.24
Date: 2/22/2010 2:01:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I am of the opinion that scouting is more important at the higher levels. Think about it; if you're a level IV team (as I am), are you really going to be able to draft a John Wall, no matter how much money you spend on scouting? Great players simply aren't available to you.


quality of the draftees doesn't depend on the division. you can draft john wall or even MJ in division V.

This Post:
00
132117.26 in reply to 132117.25
Date: 2/22/2010 2:33:55 PM
Wisconsin Grizzly Squirrels
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
3030
In my USA Level IV League, my first three drafts, scouting at 10K and picking between 5th and 13th, produced some very talented players - 4 of which I've been developing, several that I was able to sell for 300K plus.

Last season I had increased scouting to 20K, ended picking 15th. All three of my players were busts who I had cut, or sold for 1K.

this season, I will pick 16th, and I've been scouting at 5K. As people have said earlier, I'd rather save the money and purchase young talent -- the draft is so random, esp as you get into the later picks.

What I think would be fun is if you could see your first round pick, then reset the order for the second round - just seems there's not a lot of control over the players you are drafting. -oo-

This Post:
00
132117.28 in reply to 132117.25
Date: 2/22/2010 4:46:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
quality of the draftees doesn't depend on the division. you can draft john wall or even MJ in division V.


Seriously? Wow, that shatters my conceptions.

But what's still unclear is how spending more money increases your chances of getting a great player. Especially if you pick late in the draft.

This Post:
00
132117.29 in reply to 132117.28
Date: 2/22/2010 5:20:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Spending more money gets you more information on players

Getting more information on players gives you better idea on who is a better player in the draft

Though I agree if you pick late in the draft you might not want to spend that much money since there will be people picking before you. especiially in the competitive higher divisions

This Post:
00
132117.30 in reply to 132117.29
Date: 2/22/2010 7:57:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
383383
i totally agree that 10k or 20k should be the best value for money in most cases.
but from another point of view: since the revaluation of local players and the allaround crying about the high prices on the transfer market - shouldn't you spend more the later u pick, for still getting at least a nice first rounder?
maybe u dont get the 18y old 7k hall of famer but still a player which u can ad to your rotation some day.

Advertisement