Comments to previous post:
RosterIn summary, Malaysia is without properly called PF's and with a minimal roster in PG's. If other roles will be covered as expected, it will be an anomalous team, with a probable tendence to play better inside.
The good news are that some players could come out of III series draftees (we have at least an example) and that there is enough mass to start intensive, monorole training programs. In fact, having many managers that could be stimulated on that, some will surely proceed on the right, fast way, with some recovery of gaps this season, and a far better situation by end of mandate. 2) training patternsit is crystal clear that the mass of players had far than optimal trainings, i.e. multi vs monorole. Although this could look like better for a team, it is not - otherwise I would not have climbed to II series from V. Not counting III series draftees, we have more SG's with potential 6 or above than the overall amount of PG's+SG's with potential 3 or above
so there is an impressive potential to be deployed. Scouting will be much more critical than expected - and could bring better results.
3) scheduling analysisit's in progress. I would not put anyway anything here. It is too early (first, we have to check which actual skills players have), and I would not like to tell much to Malaysia's opponents.