BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 2 3 zone

2 3 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
198480.21 in reply to 198480.20
Date: 10/18/2011 7:27:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
So what about this match? (16698) My head just exploded. Centers and Power forwards on PG, SG and SF spots...PGs on PF spots...and win against Spain...what what what?? I guess BC Hostivac is really one of the greatest minds in this game.

This Post:
00
198480.22 in reply to 198480.21
Date: 10/18/2011 4:43:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
It's just that multi-skilled players will destroy you! How many Hana's are in the game today? Will your PF produce proficient OF playing at PG in attack? I don't think so (It's more a figurative "you" than actual you).

And yeah, that 2-3 dominated Spain with 9+ RBs.

Last edited by Onisifor at 10/18/2011 4:47:06 PM

This Post:
00
198480.23 in reply to 198480.10
Date: 10/18/2011 10:46:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
what would be the best tactic against 2 3 zone ? =P


Any tactic.
Are you trying to say you can play any tactic against any opponent, with any players and any set of skills they have, who plays 2-3 zone? I think that's far from the truth.

This Post:
00
198480.24 in reply to 198480.23
Date: 10/19/2011 4:12:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Are you trying to say you can play any tactic against any opponent, with any players and any set of skills they have, who plays 2-3 zone? I think that's far from the truth.


You are nicely skewing my words.

I replied to OP who's team is in the range of his opponents'.

If you take two equal and balanced teams and one plays 2-3, the other can play literally whatever it likes and the team with 2-3 defense will lose 9/10 times.

This Post:
00
198480.25 in reply to 198480.24
Date: 10/20/2011 12:07:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
If you take two equal and balanced teams and one plays 2-3, the other can play literally whatever it likes and the team with 2-3 defense will lose 9/10 times.
Interesting statement but that 1/10 is still no good for me. How to chose a tactic that wins 10/10 against 2-3 zone between two equal teams (same skills, same enthusiasm level, neutral ground .... and exclude the randomness such as foul trouble and injuries). In your experience, what is the most effective tactic against 2-3 zone?

This Post:
00
198480.26 in reply to 198480.25
Date: 10/20/2011 2:03:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
In your experience, what is the most effective tactic against 2-3 zone?


R&G, Motion, Princeton. If you have an outside focused team, also Patient, Push the Ball and Outside Isolation. I'm not sure for Inside ISO though. Should have been a mismatch since your players make so many attempts for 3.

This Post:
00
198480.28 in reply to 198480.27
Date: 10/20/2011 7:22:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
211211
but RnG is a fast paced offense and it wont give the opponent's players time to arrange the defense coz 2-3 defense is a slow defense when it comes to defending the parameter while motion is slow and by the time player will get time to shoot the 3 there is a possibility that there will be a defender on his face...

This Post:
00
198480.30 in reply to 198480.28
Date: 10/20/2011 8:50:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Besides, I also saw an increase in offensive rebounds when I play fast pace tactics, rng or inside... I must adress that I use it mainly against weaker teams, so perhaps it just because I have better inside players and with more shots, have more chances. But is something I experiences frecuently.-

Advertisement