BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > National Team Debate Thread

National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
237187.21 in reply to 237187.20
Date: 3/6/2013 3:14:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
What are the candidates opinions on Mutual TIES?

At the NT level I have found that this is a huge issue or factor depending on how it is handled. How would you approach the mutal TIE situation?

This Post:
00
237187.23 in reply to 237187.22
Date: 3/6/2013 11:21:16 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Since SF is position with highest possibility of mismatch, what would your ideal SF look like, lets say with 125 SP.

Also, what guard skill on a big man do you value the most (feel free to give a list 1-6) and which inside skill do you feel is most important for guards. Would you prefer to have shooting PG or high passing and defensive stopper?

And how do you plan to convince managers to train multiskills (just stating that they are effective and salary efficient is not enough). Would you provide some guidelines for fully trained player on individual positions or would you just be happy with posting a post on a forum and waiting for managers with interesting players to contact you?

well, for now it sums it up :D

From: Bballin

This Post:
00
237187.24 in reply to 237187.3
Date: 3/7/2013 12:13:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
ill reply to all the questions tomorrow since I have not the time.

From: jfarb

This Post:
00
237187.25 in reply to 237187.24
Date: 3/7/2013 12:30:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
Smoking dope while watching Pinky and the Brain again huh?? Where are your priorities man?

Vote for jfarb.

From: jfarb
This Post:
00
237187.26 in reply to 237187.25
Date: 3/7/2013 12:57:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
No wait sorry that was me in high school.

Still vote for jfarb.

From: Bballin

This Post:
00
237187.29 in reply to 237187.17
Date: 3/7/2013 3:01:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
Honestly. EAK is still our number 1, even at 33 for at least another season, maybe two. I dont think we will need to worry too much on the SF issue until next term. However, at that point our younger SFs should have developed enough to be more than good enough for the big stage. If not, we have plenty of SFs that are specialized either inside or outside and a couple of balanced SFs. I will most likely be saving a spot for EAK and two SF callups throughout the season since I expect we might need an inside oriented SF or an outside oriented SF. We also have many PFs with the ability to play SF in a LI offense. Some names I can throw around: Hall, Chretien, Fairchild, Labbe, Cutler, Thomas, even Lacroix is still looking decent.

This Post:
00
237187.30 in reply to 237187.18
Date: 3/7/2013 3:04:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
Honestly I have tried. Its difficult and requires a lot of commitment. Contests, write-ups and nagging seem to be the only way I can develop interest and even then its only temporary.

I think developing a large depth chart open to the ECU community will get people with prospects trying to improve their player, trying to get in discussions and others without prospects to get those players on the list.

Obviously having success during the season will generate interest and an Americas Championship should do the trick :)

Advertisement