BuzzerBeater Forums

Thanks for the effort to develop my idea. Also ...maybe I don't understant well 100% everything correctly because at least I am not using English interface but Bulgarian and I don't know how some things in the game are working right now. And maybe also my English is not the best. So, mistakes in my understanding of your comment are possible :)

But anyway - I totally disagree assistant to be selected by the users! The idea for assistant in my head is someone to helps and supports the national coach the way national coach feels he want it.

Only the national coach should choose his assistant. Only if he wants it!
The national coach should have the option to fire his assistant and to put a new one when he feels he wants it. He can have 10 assistants during the mandate if he wants.
Also, the assistant is not obligatory - the coach decides to have assistant or to not have.
National coach should have options to choose the rights he gives to his assistant:
- possibility to change lineup or not change
- possibility to put players in team and take them out ..or not have this possibility
The coach should have possibility to change these options all the time - like right now I play the game in Bulgarian but if I want I can change it to English :)

The assistant will see players of the national team all the time - this will not be optional since he is assistant.
And I think the best way for communication is a wall-chat with there chatting only the coach and his assistant to develop tactics for the match or something.

In my head things should be very flexible so every national coach to profit the best way of his assistant as each coach to decide which right to give to his assistant. Elected assistant could be a big problem potentially and I really don't believe in this suggestion.

Ok ...but this should be a discussion in the forums I think :) You can ask the candidates about their intentions to use assistant or not ...and which one. But I don't think the assistant will be so big problem for you since the main decisions will be taken by the coach I believe.

I think you vote for the coach and assistant just helps the coach. But if the assistant will be also a scout and will be the person to communicate with people - maybe this should be a reason the assistant to be more important for your vote. Otherwise, the assistant possibly will make lineups for some friendly for example and it is not such a big problem maybe for your vote.

But anyway, you can ask the candidates and then decide if the assistant is really important in your opinion. Or aks them in pvt messages if you don't want in the forums.

For example, I don't have a problem who the assistant will be and I will vote for the coach mainly :)

Especially if the staff would have the opportunity to scout players, would like to know who they are and have a say (with my vote) before they can scout whoever they want.

I think this is the most common concern here. That said, it isn't really too different from the current informal scouting team isn't it? Aren't those teams usually self appointed by the NT coach as well?

It would be tough if we actually needed to register a team of 2 for the election - but I guess this would root out those people who join elections on a whim with no preparations. An easier way out would be to get them to state who their assistant is during the election debates and pick your favorite choice, but I'm not sure how much would that solve, considering (I heard) that in some bigger countries, a lot of people don't bother with the debate thread and just votes for the candidate with the highest WR.

maybe assistant coaches have a special feature where they can scout without calling players up to the roster?

That also seems a very good idea, I also understand Perpete's concerns regarding the head coach directly appointing an assistant without elections, assistant coach should have the approval of the community. Overall I think the suggestion should be voted in a global poll