had time to organize themselves.
The US over perform in quality/participant ratio in my opinion. e.g. in England, Italy etc, 90% of kids play football, but the coaching and facilities, on the whole, are rubbish compared to the US, where maybe more like 20% of kids play football (and then choose to go on to american football/baseball/basketball instead).As such, i think the US overperforms overall. They did well at the Confed Cup which can be taken any way, however they did get to the quarters in 06 and the last 16 in 10, so something is going right.
2) not having a meaningful league facilitates tactical organization, so everything is planned in function of the WC except for those 1 or 2 players that are second stringers in some team in Europe
here is what's going wrong:1) the best athletes play Basketball or Football