BuzzerBeater Forums

BB England > National Team Debate Thread

National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
109310.205 in reply to 109310.203
Date: 9/11/2009 9:19:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
again

Well, you said it earlier that there were lots of people willing to help you. You didn't refer to them as your team members, but for the people from outside ( the voters) it looked like you were talking about them like they were from your team

helping is not the same as being on my team... again you are assuming things... and making things up that were never said.

This Post:
00
109310.206 in reply to 109310.204
Date: 9/11/2009 9:21:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
So you criticise us to have ONE member of our staff that naever talk in here. Your staff nver appear. And please stop talk in "insulting"


again I have never said this or criticised you for this. I dont care if he posts in here or not. I do care when you say yourself, that he has very little time to help you... These are 2 very different things. Please start getting your facts right.

and dont tell me how people will read and understand my messages? how can you know this?

This Post:
00
109310.207 in reply to 109310.206
Date: 9/11/2009 9:22:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167

You were right, ardain and soel didn't post here. It means they don't have time to help you. Or am I wrong


indeed, you are very wrong.

This Post:
00
109310.208 in reply to 109310.206
Date: 9/11/2009 9:26:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
So you criticise us to have ONE member of our staff that naever talk in here. Your staff nver appear. And please stop talk in "insulting"


again I have never said this or criticised you for this. I dont care if he posts in here or not. I do care when you say yourself, that he has very little time to help you... These are 2 very different things. Please start getting your facts right.

and dont tell me how people will read and understand my messages? how can you know this?



What??

ou "criticise" my position as a candidate and as I understand my reasoning behind my candadicy. However, I dont understand how you can give your support to a group off candidates openly stating that they are a 3 man team, off whom 2 lack the real experience to compete at a higher level and where the 3rd person that should bring in the tactical knowledge at higher level really doesnt have the time to do this job??


You said that today. You don't remember it???? I think I don't need to look dor a post older than this one where you say that he doens't has time to help because he doens't post here

This Post:
00
109310.209 in reply to 109310.208
Date: 9/11/2009 9:30:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
"criticise" my position as a candidate and as I understand my reasoning behind my candadicy. However, I dont understand how you can give your support to a group off candidates openly stating that they are a 3 man team, off whom 2 lack the real experience to compete at a higher level and where the 3rd person that should bring in the tactical knowledge at higher level really doesnt have the time to do this job??


no where do i say that he has no time because he isnt posting in here????

This Post:
00
109310.210 in reply to 109310.184
Date: 9/11/2009 9:31:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00

You "criticise" my position as a candidate and as I understand my reasoning behind my candadicy. However, I dont understand how you can give your support to a group off candidates openly stating that they are a 3 man team, off whom 2 lack the real experience to compete at a higher level and where the 3rd person that should bring in the tactical knowledge at higher level really doesnt have the time to do this job??

at 11-09-2009 8:27:49

again I have never said this or criticised you for this. I dont care if he posts in here or not. I do care when you say yourself, that he has very little time to help you... These are 2 very different things. Please start getting your facts right.


Do you want more facts men?

This Post:
00
109310.211 in reply to 109310.209
Date: 9/11/2009 9:32:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
so it's the same for your staff team

This Post:
00
109310.212 in reply to 109310.209
Date: 9/11/2009 9:32:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
"criticise" my position as a candidate and as I understand my reasoning behind my candadicy. However, I dont understand how you can give your support to a group off candidates openly stating that they are a 3 man team, off whom 2 lack the real experience to compete at a higher level and where the 3rd person that should bring in the tactical knowledge at higher level really doesnt have the time to do this job??


no where do i say that he has no time because he isnt posting in here????


Again, you said that earlier. And, if your team members aren't posting here is because:

1- They don't have time
2- They lack in interest
3_- The both



This Post:
00
109310.213 in reply to 109310.211
Date: 9/11/2009 9:37:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
yup it is the same for my staff team.

however they are not the people that bring the tactical knowledge as the person that is in your team has the most knowledge and has very little time. you said this yourself... so the very important person in your team has no time and the scouts in my team have no time, I dont see this as a problem because we dont need to do scouting since we have a tool to do this... see the difference? I bet you dont, because you cant or dont want to see the difference...

This Post:
00
109310.214 in reply to 109310.213
Date: 9/11/2009 9:46:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
We never said that he would bring the knowledge. We just said he could help, because you doubted our skills. And, if we say he will help us, it's because he will help us.This thread has over 200 posts, with replys being posted in every 3 minutes. Helping us in tactical issues, he only takes maybe half an hour. BEcause we will do everything, and then, ask him about what we would change. I don't think it takes much time.

And about your staff team, if they aren't helping with tactical issues, neither with scouting issues, what are they doing? Maybe they are in your team just because you needed names. Or maybe theyare there to give you moral support.

This Post:
00
109310.215 in reply to 109310.213
Date: 9/11/2009 10:12:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Remember when I said the 2 options one person has when he doesn't know how to receive a critic? Well maybe you don't remember, since you didn't remember many of the things that you had said. So here it goes:

1- You can't take the critic, so you stop answering
2- You can't take the critic, so you start insulting or atacking

You chose the 1st one. This is not the first time you log off after someone questioning you or when the debate turns to our side. What will you do when you have all the BB comunity criticizing you? Will you assume your mistake? Or will you just run away?

Advertisement