BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make the best players actually desirable

Make the best players actually desirable

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
158188.205 in reply to 158188.204
Date: 10/24/2010 10:42:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
You look just the same for us.

This Post:
00
158188.206 in reply to 158188.202
Date: 10/24/2010 11:56:59 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
As I can see many listed players from other NT's I'm not sure they are already on this way. And my strategy is not new, we don't start it right now but many seasons ago. And also NT is not about huge userbase so much. 10-15 players can be enough and it's possible to make this players in country of our size (Switzerland has similar userbase).

This Post:
00
158188.207 in reply to 158188.206
Date: 10/24/2010 1:03:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
As I can see many listed players from other NT's I'm not sure they are already on this way.

I'm pretty sure they are going in this way,for example almost all the centers in the italian team were trained in some way in outside skills during thier career,many teams create amazing SF and we are starting to see some PF and so on,the difference still rely on primary skils...no matter how strong a center can be in outside skills,but a 100k C however will be beaten from his adversaries in C position(look at the salary of Switzerland's big man)

This Post:
00
158188.208 in reply to 158188.207
Date: 10/24/2010 4:33:52 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
I'm not talking about 100k C's. Our NT is on half way at the moment, no player has finished his training yet. But well trained multiskilled C's with wage 250-300k can compete with any C's I have seen on TL yet (but surely there can be better players which haven't been on TL yet).
And it's always strange, if some player is C. Good multiskilled C should be more PF than C (but some of them can be close to PF).
At the moment there are 10 players with 300k+ salary at transfer list, 7 of them are on NT rosters. I can hardly any of them imagine on roster if they were czechs.

Last edited by rwystyrk at 10/24/2010 4:50:56 PM

This Post:
00
158188.209 in reply to 158188.208
Date: 10/24/2010 5:48:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I'm not talking about 100k C's. Our NT is on half way at the moment, no player has finished his training yet

I hope that you are talking about player actually out fo the Nt,because only one big man has 23 years or less,and the others except Hana are far from being at the level of the other Nt centers
But well trained multiskilled C's with wage 250-300k can compete with any C's I have seen on TL yet (but surely there can be better players which haven't been on TL yet).
And it's always strange, if some player is C. Good multiskilled C should be more PF than C (but some of them can be close to PF).

Completely agree with you
At the moment there are 10 players with 300k+ salary at transfer list, 7 of them are on NT rosters. I can hardly any of them imagine on roster if they were czechs.

I think that all the players with SB<11 would easily be in your Nt if they were czech

This Post:
11
158188.210 in reply to 158188.209
Date: 10/24/2010 6:04:40 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
I hope that you are talking about player actually out fo the Nt,because only one big man has 23 years or less,and the others except Hana are far from being at the level of the other Nt centers

Bigger problem than age is potential for current NT bigmen.
I think that all the players with SB<11 would easily be in your Nt if they were czech

Believe me, I wouldn't call him I would rather play with current 100k players.


This Post:
00
158188.212 in reply to 158188.211
Date: 10/25/2010 4:41:53 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
Yesterday there were only bigmen. Now, there are 2 guards. These guards would help us. But among bigmen [edit: player 2] is only one I can think of. None of them is better choice than Hána for C and none of them can play on PF. They are usefull for very specific tactic that I don't want to play. I think it's better to have in meantime little bit worse team but build on my way than using in short-term players with no future.

Last edited by Joey Ka at 10/25/2010 9:16:22 AM

This Post:
00
158188.213 in reply to 158188.212
Date: 10/25/2010 7:31:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Yesterday there were only bigmen. Now, there are 2 guards. These guards would help us. But among bigmen Leitao is only one I can think of. None of them is better choice than Hána for C and none of them can play on PF. They are usefull for very specific tactic that I don't want to play. I think it's better to have in meantime little bit worse team but build on my way than using in short-term players with no future.

But if hana is out of shape or injured,you would be very weak at C position(and actually without hana's reserve your team is yet below the other teams).The difference between the stronger NTs and the other is in the number of players of nearly the same level in NT,that you can put on the field having the same level of the starters if something bad happen to the starters
In addition to that,to play inside tactics you need more ceners with higher inside skills possible,so you would still need them to play more effetively these tactics and to have more tactics available for your team,creating tactic problems to the other coaches
P.S. [edit: player 1] is a better Pf than [edit: player 2] because player 2's Jr is non-existent

Last edited by Joey Ka at 10/25/2010 9:15:45 AM

This Post:
00
158188.214 in reply to 158188.213
Date: 10/25/2010 8:14:35 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
Yes, it's true, one player is not enough. But at the moment I'm happy we have Hana, few seasons ago we didn't have anyone. Maybe in few season we can have 3 or 4 similar players. I think if you have good community and not high risk of bad game shape than 5 PG/SG, 3 SF and 5 PF/C (each of them able to play as a starter) with some little bit worse backups can be enough.
Both of them (player 1, player 2) are very "ugly" in my eyes, 27 and 28 sum of outside skills it's far away from our players. It's totally unacceptable for me even if they have tripple 20 IS, ID, REB. Last week we played away match in Greece without Hana and it was very close game (came to overtime). As I said before our NT is improving step by step, there is no need tu hurry. I know it will take many seasons before we reach the top NT's.

Last edited by Joey Ka at 10/25/2010 9:14:37 AM

Advertisement