BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.21 in reply to 14900.20
Date: 2/8/2008 7:04:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Playing Take it Easy in an away game is just very risky.

There is no point in saying that your players have better skills than your opponents since you played Take it Easy.

Edited by LA-PatjeBono (2/8/2008 7:04:24 AM CET)

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 2/8/2008 7:04:24 AM

This Post:
00
14900.22 in reply to 14900.21
Date: 2/8/2008 7:14:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Okay, that you can say about Take it easy, almost every time then team play TIE you lost, simple example go to LBBL and more than half teams lost against bot, I don't understand that, I understand you play easy, but BOT can't win against active team, or it play TIE or no...

This Post:
00
14900.23 in reply to 14900.22
Date: 2/8/2008 7:32:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Of course not, this isn't Hattrick. You just want an easy victory or something? The way bots are right now is nice, you still need to be carefull with take it easy, which is perfect.

Otherwise it would be too easy and unfair, when you got a nice schedule with some bots in front of important matches you can easily tank you enthusiasm there, while the other one maybe has to play versus normal users.

Bots are just teams who need to compete, bots should win vs managers who underestimate the effects of take it easy etc, just like what happend to me in the cup yesterday, just a bot eh? Minute Subs + take it easy, result 22 points loss lol.

There is nothing wrong with that.

This Post:
00
14900.24 in reply to 14900.23
Date: 2/8/2008 7:42:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
I allso like that bot aren`t just statistics... they allso could be real chalange... It`s more interesting to play then it would be you just win by 30 points every time with you subs...

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
14900.25 in reply to 14900.23
Date: 2/8/2008 7:47:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
But if you can't win against bot with TIE, so against who you can play TIE ??? I think then BB should delete that function, because it you use then you want lose against everyone... If no you need play normal...

This Post:
00
14900.26 in reply to 14900.20
Date: 2/8/2008 8:24:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
But anyway they are more better then my opponent players, also what you offer sacrifice my basic training and start train STAMINA ?

Look, if you don't want to know why your players didn't perform up to their skills, then don't start a thread asking why you lost.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
From: CitB

This Post:
00
14900.27 in reply to 14900.25
Date: 2/8/2008 8:31:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
But if you can't win against bot with TIE, so against who you can play TIE ??? I think then BB should delete that function, because it you use then you want lose against everyone... If no you need play normal...

of course it gives you some options, like you could tie all away games and be stronger at your homegames, you could tie against the best teams in your league to be better at the games against the other teams in your league or tie your cupgames to be better in the leaguegames or tie your leaguegames to be better at your cupgames or you tie just every game to keep an high motivation or or or see this gives you a lot of options for your team.

This Post:
00
14900.28 in reply to 14900.25
Date: 2/8/2008 5:22:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
But if you can't win against bot with TIE, so against who you can play TIE ??? I think then BB should delete that function, because it you use then you want lose against everyone... If no you need play normal...


You can win vs a bot with TIE, but your problem is that you assume that you win every time vs a bot when you play TIE.

If everyone would lose every game when they played TIE they wouldn't use it anymore, but still lots of people had 9+ enthusiams when they entered the playoffs, so I guess it really is possible to use TIE the right way I did win 8 out of 11 played games with TIE, so TIE /= Losing.

Edited by LA-PatjeBono (2/8/2008 5:22:57 PM CET)

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 2/8/2008 5:22:57 PM

This Post:
00
14900.29 in reply to 14900.28
Date: 2/8/2008 11:39:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
TIE is also interesting (but very risky) for top teams - as you could have the attitude that your opponent will throw the game as you suggested to get an advantage in a more closely matched game.....

Ive got to say i still edge on the side of caution and play normal more often than not as a) enthusiasm isnt needed as much now as during the playoffs and b) i dont want an uneccessary defeat followed by a poor attendence for my next game... if someone wants to beat me then they have to have better tactics/players/enthusiasm and play normal or CT and if so then i'll begrudgingly accept the defeat and move on....

From: CitB
This Post:
00
14900.31 in reply to 14900.1
Date: 2/9/2008 7:20:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
check this one, im happy thats not one of mine...
(2475934)

Advertisement