BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > DRAFT

DRAFT

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
239376.21 in reply to 239376.4
Date: 4/8/2013 3:30:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Agreed...And I also agree with the premise that the draft as it is now, is a waste of data space. I would be in favor of anything to make the draft more relevant.

From: Timbo4

This Post:
11
239376.22 in reply to 239376.12
Date: 4/14/2013 3:39:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
116116
In the event the amount of support for any particular ideas leads to changes in the game, I completely agree that the draft should provide a higher % of useable trainees.

I really like yodabig's suggestion. In fact, this might completely solve the problem (at least how I see it). We don't need to flood the game with MVPs/HOFs/ATGs. But we do need more all-stars and perennial all-stars in the draft, and less 1 ball potential players.

I could also really support thylacine's suggestion #3 (increasing the skill level, on average, of 19 year olds)

From: tykit

This Post:
00
239376.23 in reply to 239376.12
Date: 4/15/2013 6:11:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
Hi,
I was wondering about another different way to decrease the amount of useless draft picks :
Are drafted only players who are at least scouted once.
Only managers who spend their scouting points get draft picks.

It wont change the challenge of finding a high potential out of the other draft applicants. Bots won't get draftees (and no more 18 yo 4k HoF in a bot's roster). Low potential players or low skilled ones won't be drafted that often neither.

Do you think this could be implemented ? It shouldn't need much changes in GE i guess ...
Cheers