BuzzerBeater Forums

The problem is that this is a game. And the mechanism of the game has not changed for more than 10 years. For old players, it has long been understood and does not need any in-depth analytics (it is simply primitive here and is not particularly needed). There are enough to expose 3-4 dominant players and dilute them with 1-2 weak players. And what bench is not important at all.

The usual picture - a stronger start completely dominates, increasing the advantage. Bench plays already on hold. I did it many times. And many times I saw such situations. The whole game was supposed to be like 3 quarter. A 4th quarter should be a formality. But for some reason, players with salaries of 70-90k and the number of skills +115 could not do anything against players with a salary of 9-12k. Although according to the logic of things, when there were 4 players on the floor, who are many times stronger than their opponents, there should have been complete domination.

I have been in the game for quite some time. It’s not a dinosaur, but still not many players play from season 17. Therefore, I understand the mechanism of the game and predict it. He is not so complicated that I was something very puzzled. But in this case, I'm just stunned by the outcome of the game. Such an outcome defies any logic. Between the starting lineups just the gap in the difference of skills and abilities. There should have been complete domination of one team over another, but in the end there was some strange leapfrog.

I rarely chat on the forums. But in this case I simply could not restrain myself, I want to get a clear answer about what happened. I heard only two versions, but they did not convince me. I put up for sale the players who played. For everyone to see from the skills.

It should be clear that the matter is not in passes - the average of the starting lineup is 6.8. This is a very good result against players 9-12k.

It is also not a matter of ratings. The rating is so bad just because of the bench with two bad players. But my questions are exactly to the starting lineups. Why, when there were 4 players on the court at once, who are many times superior to the opponent, there were no quite logical jerks?

Well, everyone has long known such a joke when a player with a long-range shot is put on the center position and he is against the center without external defense, he is shooting from the perimeter. But this is not the case.

you played with 4 players
sometimes the 5th one will make the difference (like going 0-10 while the 2 opponent SG score 33 points)

just use a 5k player who doesn't completely suck like your 2k one probably does

I know perfectly well that my position was weaker than that of my opponent. The question is different: why then 4 my other positions did not dominate, although there the difference in the players is much larger than the difference in SG?

Super komentaras! (y)