BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Strategy for the match

Strategy for the match

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
41887.21 in reply to 41887.19
Date: 9/1/2008 4:14:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
You're the manager. You pick the players, you train them, and you tell them how to play. Want a bigger arena? Build it. Want to draft a superstar? It's all about scouting. You make the decisions and you’re in charge!

That comes from sign in page.

I pick the players. (Manager brings them in coach decides who plays)
You train them (strictly a coach’s job, no self respecting coach would let management tell them how to train)
You tell them how to play (coach decision again)
Want a bigger arena (management only)
Draft a superstar (both the coach and management)
You make the decisions and you’re in charge! (I’m not in charge as the coach constantly makes decisions I would never make)

You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, Know when to walk away and know when to run. You never count your money when youre sittin at the table. Therell be time enough for countin when the dealins done.
This Post:
00
41887.22 in reply to 41887.17
Date: 9/13/2008 9:06:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
What the game needs is a big amount of conditions and consecuences. For example.
"If player x of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"

Team A sets:
"If player X of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"
"If player Z of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player U"
"If the other team is playing outside, I defende 3-2"

Team B sets:
"If player Y of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Z"
"If the other team is defending 2-3, I play outside"
"If player U of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player X
"If the other team is defending 3-2, I play inside"

...

Last edited by hoo-cee at 9/13/2008 9:07:43 PM

This Post:
00
41887.23 in reply to 41887.22
Date: 9/14/2008 4:12:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You can see that kind of things in a real match.

But you can only make substitutions in the middle of free throws and time-outs.
And offence decides how to play when they see the defence, every play. (in fact, in Europe you can see a team changing zone-individual defense every play, or full-court pressure-half court defence)

Last edited by FCardelle at 9/14/2008 4:14:57 AM

This Post:
00
41887.24 in reply to 41887.22
Date: 9/14/2008 5:55:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"


aren't such advices boring, because i becomes nearly impossible to kill the opponent with your advices because every team acts right on the opponent orders? If such things implemented, you could cut off all orders, in my eyes.

This Post:
00
41887.25 in reply to 41887.24
Date: 9/14/2008 6:17:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
Yep, I wouldn't like it either. Would be also too complicated and time-consuming.

From: Shoei

This Post:
00
41887.26 in reply to 41887.25
Date: 9/15/2008 10:45:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
the beauty of bb compare to other online basketball manager games for me is not just in the real time you get to watch it live with a court and you see shot sttempted and how it goes.

but the simplicity of how to navigate things around compare to other sites.

i did try to play other but i get so bothered and bored because it takes me so much time just to get a game set, my players training module and ect.

you cant just set thngs automatically or with a lot of if and donts,

i think this person just needed to be taught how to check and scout other teams,
its not easy but the challenge and excitement of this, you get to see clearly if your strategy or gamble pays off.


This Post:
00
41887.27 in reply to 41887.26
Date: 9/15/2008 11:54:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
the beauty of bb compare to other online basketball manager games for me is not just in the real time you get to watch it live with a court and you see shot sttempted and how it goes.

but the simplicity of how to navigate things around compare to other sites.

i did try to play other but i get so bothered and bored because it takes me so much time just to get a game set, my players training module and ect.

you cant just set thngs automatically or with a lot of if and donts,

i think this person just needed to be taught how to check and scout other teams,
its not easy but the challenge and excitement of this, you get to see clearly if your strategy or gamble pays off.



I completely agree with this.

This isn't meant to be rocket science.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
41887.28 in reply to 41887.22
Date: 9/16/2008 11:56:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
What the game needs is a big amount of conditions and consecuences. For example.
"If player x of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"

Team A sets:
"If player X of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"
"If player Z of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player U"
"If the other team is playing outside, I defende 3-2"

Team B sets:
"If player Y of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Z"
"If the other team is defending 2-3, I play outside"
"If player U of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player X
"If the other team is defending 3-2, I play inside"

...

I could maybe agree with the part about the duel between the players,i certainly don't agree with your suggestion about tattica.In your idea,you cannot use it to beat other teams because it's too easy to prepare a tattic against enemy offense and so on

This Post:
00
41887.29 in reply to 41887.28
Date: 9/16/2008 2:48:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
I could maybe agree with the part about the duel between the players,i certainly don't agree with your suggestion about tattica.In your idea,you cannot use it to beat other teams because it's too easy to prepare a tattic against enemy offense and so on

It isn't my idea and I wouldn't like that either.

That was actually to illustrate a case where those if-conditions would "go in circles".

This Post:
00
41887.30 in reply to 41887.1
Date: 9/16/2008 8:57:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not always able to watch my BB games, so I don't really like this idea...

Say you're running an inside offense, and the other team is running a defense that isn't so spectacular against inside plays...if you're not home, then you'll have to stay on inside offense, while the other team can switch to a 2-3 and stop you alot better...

Just doesn't seem fair to me.

This Post:
00
41887.31 in reply to 41887.30
Date: 9/16/2008 10:23:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not always able to watch my BB games, so I don't really like this idea...

Say you're running an inside offense, and the other team is running a defense that isn't so spectacular against inside plays...if you're not home, then you'll have to stay on inside offense, while the other team can switch to a 2-3 and stop you alot better...

Just doesn't seem fair to me.

And who says that you should be running inside offense all the time?

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement