BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Game shape = random?

Game shape = random?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Warrior
This Post:
00
68860.21 in reply to 68860.20
Date: 1/18/2009 10:06:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
without a doubt, there was change in the GS system in the last season, which the BB didn't released any information about this change..

more random as you said here.. we would happy to hear some words from the staff about this thing and how it calculated, and why the specialist doctor so useless.

Thanks

This Post:
00
68860.22 in reply to 68860.21
Date: 1/19/2009 11:15:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
without a doubt, there was change in the GS system in the last season, which the BB didn't released any information about this change..

more random as you said here.. we would happy to hear some words from the staff about this thing and how it calculated, and why the specialist doctor so useless.

Thanks


Without a doubt there was no change.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.23 in reply to 68860.22
Date: 1/19/2009 11:17:46 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
without a doubt, there was change in the GS system in the last season, which the BB didn't released any information about this change..

more random as you said here.. we would happy to hear some words from the staff about this thing and how it calculated, and why the specialist doctor so useless.

Thanks


Without a doubt there was no change.


Juice but you know for sure because some BBs told you or it's simply your opinion?

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
68860.24 in reply to 68860.23
Date: 1/19/2009 11:19:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
without a doubt, there was change in the GS system in the last season, which the BB didn't released any information about this change..

more random as you said here.. we would happy to hear some words from the staff about this thing and how it calculated, and why the specialist doctor so useless.

Thanks


Without a doubt there was no change.


Juice but you know for sure because some BBs told you or it's simply your opinion?


Straight from the BBs.

I try as much as I can to make clear when something is my opinion.

If I strongly state something to be fact, it's because I've been told by one of the BBs that it is so.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.25 in reply to 68860.22
Date: 1/19/2009 11:19:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .

Last edited by Warrior at 1/19/2009 11:20:22 AM

This Post:
00
68860.26 in reply to 68860.25
Date: 1/19/2009 11:21:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


No, I never said that.

The last GS change was announced, and was several seasons back, when the extremity of GS drops for overplaying was toned down.

It hasn't changed since.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.27 in reply to 68860.26
Date: 1/19/2009 11:34:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Ok.. but most of the people saw changes in this system recently and more "random" in the results, which doesn't appeared before.

So if so much people (and more than who responded here) say that they feel a change, so might be something there.. no ?

Last edited by Warrior at 1/19/2009 11:34:31 AM

This Post:
00
68860.28 in reply to 68860.27
Date: 1/19/2009 11:36:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I don't know how much more clear I can make this.

There has been no change, period.

You repeating it isn't going to trigger a change, either, so there's really no point in continuing to press me for info on something that doesn't exist.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.29 in reply to 68860.26
Date: 1/19/2009 12:39:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


No, I never said that.

Some might. :)

This Post:
00
68860.30 in reply to 68860.25
Date: 1/19/2009 1:00:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


What are you talking about? Do you believe your own words?

If there is a small random factor in the calculation of Game Shape, then it might surely be that one got no problems 5 seasons in a row. In the 6th season it may be the 1st time that a player's gameshape is negativly influence by the randomness, instead of positivly. Then one reports it as a bug, fine no problems, since it's clarified now.

Your posts are useless this way if you keep on saying no while there has been confirmed yes several times. Why do you even post here if you don't even accept anything else but your own view?

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 1/19/2009 1:01:34 PM

This Post:
00
68860.31 in reply to 68860.30
Date: 1/19/2009 1:34:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
i think there is a point in what you say the random factor should be in positive and negative

but....

If there is a small random factor in the calculation of Game Shape, then it might surely be that one got no problems 5 seasons in a row. In the 6th season it may be the 1st time that a player's gameshape is negativly influence by the randomness, instead of positivly. Then one reports it as a bug, fine no problems, since it's clarified now.


i think he is not the only one that think this way he might have say it not so political correct but if there was a change (and the BB's say no) we shod have bean announced abut it even if it was correcting something that had a problem for 5 seasons till now and i am talking abut the random factor going both positive and negative



Your posts are useless this way if you keep on saying no while there has been confirmed yes several times. Why do you even post here if you don't even accept anything else but your own view?


here i just think it was pointless you make a availed point and then just insult a guy and just say he dont need to post what he thinks that just rude if you ask me

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
Advertisement