BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Private league 10

Private league 10

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
212354.211 in reply to 212354.210
Date: 6/8/2012 8:49:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
612612
He is going to be ahead of you by alot more come end of the season chump

Garrie Addison (18085302). The G-Adder striking blows since season 15
This Post:
00
212354.212 in reply to 212354.211
Date: 6/8/2012 9:02:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
Chump eh? I see how it is.

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
212354.213 in reply to 212354.209
Date: 6/8/2012 9:23:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Yeah my comment was not really that GS isn't realistic at all but, for me, it's a little bit too unrealistic in BB. Perhaps there should be more options for how many minutes each player plays. Your stars should see the court every game, even if it isn't for the full 48mins. Apart from very few understandable instances, could you imagine a game where Lebron sits out?

This Post:
00
212354.214 in reply to 212354.208
Date: 6/8/2012 9:24:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
I'll give it a go.

Does it matter which league/region etc. I sign up to?

This Post:
00
212354.215 in reply to 212354.212
Date: 6/8/2012 9:34:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
612612
yeh you know your place

Garrie Addison (18085302). The G-Adder striking blows since season 15
From: mllama

This Post:
11
212354.216 in reply to 212354.214
Date: 6/8/2012 9:40:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
I personally like game shape just for the strategy element. Game would probably get stale quickly if I could just roll out my best starting 5 each game with no real thought.

At least there is an element of strategy and tradeoff with the current GS system - do I go all out in my league games, hold some players back for the cup, etc etc.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
212354.217 in reply to 212354.216
Date: 6/8/2012 9:51:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Exactly. I am willing to trade a little less realism for a lot more interesting game play.

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
212354.218 in reply to 212354.216
Date: 6/8/2012 10:09:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Yeah definitely not disagreeing with the fact that it's important. It's just that there should be a sliding scale, rather than a yes/no option for your stars to play (I know you can put them on the bench, but that's not the same.).

From: Mr J

This Post:
00
212354.219 in reply to 212354.218
Date: 6/9/2012 2:24:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
441441
It's just that there should be a sliding scale, rather than a yes/no option


For individual players or the whoel team? I like the idea, particularly for individual players. Would require far greater management/skill but a lot of work for BB perhaps.

From: mllama

This Post:
00
212354.220 in reply to 212354.218
Date: 6/9/2012 2:51:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
That's definately something that would be nice. I used to remember back in the day that when my team had no depth, I'd play my stars off the bench and they'd rack up 40 minutes anyway. Very frustrating.

This Post:
00
212354.221 in reply to 212354.215
Date: 6/9/2012 3:19:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
I hope I beat bsb by 25+ to stay on top :)

Advertisement