BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181900.212 in reply to 181900.210
Date: 7/23/2011 7:15:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
You havent read my message at all... i wrote in 2-3 SF PF are more responsible for outside than 2-1-2 im suggesting a new zone whatever it is 2-1-2 or any other because there is 2 outside zones and if you can find how to beat one with current lineup another will hurt you more while there's 1 inside zone and if you find how to beat it... well...

and 2-1-2 and 2-3 is actually the same thing but players are slightly doing different roles...

so youre sating that for 2-3 court must be 20 feet wide...

This Post:
00
181900.213 in reply to 181900.212
Date: 7/23/2011 9:27:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
My point is that in a 2-1-2 nobody is guarding the wings. Nobody can drive on you but who cares when their shooters can stand in the corner with nobody even close to them. Try diagramming it. You'll see.

Last edited by RiseandFire at 7/23/2011 9:27:22 PM

This Post:
00
181900.214 in reply to 181900.211
Date: 7/24/2011 12:10:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
Wow that's insane, to beat a team like Flumpaci with the 2-3 zone... incredible.

Check the Suggestions they are important
This Post:
00
181900.215 in reply to 181900.214
Date: 7/24/2011 2:05:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i got frydek too in the past with it.

From: Marot

This Post:
00
181900.217 in reply to 181900.216
Date: 7/24/2011 7:54:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
It's the only team where 2-3 seems to work.

The question is, why 3-2 is so easy to play and 2-3 need so special players?

This Post:
00
181900.218 in reply to 181900.216
Date: 7/24/2011 10:16:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
did it before, my guards aren't superior in OD(16 and 15 Starter, backup 13), my SF had (OD 15 and ID 10 blocking 2, backup 12/10/8) my bigs mostly have OD 8+(one with 11 also rotates sometimes on SF) and ID 17/15/11/12 SB 11/8/9/5(the first two are my usual starters, the last two the backups the C starter have just a 4 in OD).

So overall i don't have are extraordinary squad, and when i play inside against 2-3 i get also trouble against it, so my squad is after Marot logic also the only one where 2-3 works against.

This Post:
00
181900.219 in reply to 181900.217
Date: 7/25/2011 3:46:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
More2-3 zone magic (15847)

Check the Suggestions they are important
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
181900.222 in reply to 181900.221
Date: 7/26/2011 1:40:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Is 1-3-1 better than M2M or 3-2? Both 2-3 and 1-3-1 are for situational use only. 2-3 will help you get those needed boards if opponent pushes for inside tacs, but will be wide open if opponents can hit from further than under the basket. 1-3-1 will get smashed inside if opponent has decent passing and capable big men. Will not help you if your SF and PF can't defend outside.
These tacs should be used only if the opponent has no real threat from inside (reb, def big men) or outside (no decent jump shooters). Both of these tacs have more disadvantages than advantages compared to M2M and 3-2. I have found use for both from time to time. But there aren't many onesided teams in upper divisions.

Advertisement