BuzzerBeater Forums

it makes sense indeed... but it remains very strange to me nevertheless considering the huge difference in the summary figures.
Moreover, looking at the DMI, taking into consideration the 5 main players (who played more than 40 minutes in avg) the total was 1,7 Mio Vs 0,8 Mio.... So it means that this does not represent anything or what? 4 players had a DMI higher than their direct opponent and one had about the same. the form was better for all the players compared to their opponents... And contrarly to what Jo told... soria is not weak in defence...and so the result of the chorev is unexpected and unexpectable.... Sure that the presence of pruna would have help the result to be different too... but even without that it should logically (due to all the mentionned elements) have been different... so is there an element of unregularity in the equation of the motor of the game that can come out unexpectantly...?
All this will of not change the history and even if it's a pitty for me and leave me with some unexplained questions... The winner is nevertheless great and worth it in regards of what he is doing with his team and with the National team!
Good luck for the playoffs... to all the ones who will have the chance to take part!!!

leave me with some unexplained questions...

shoot; maybe we can try to answer.

I agree the result was likely to be different, yet it wasn't so impossible, so yes, unexpected, weak engine? certainly not. It's these kind of things that make the game exiting. If the team with the highest winning-chance always wins, there is not much fun to the game.

Also, as Joe said, I do not know his players and their skills, and I believe him if he says they have to do with it too.

Finally about DMI: forget about it! it is short for Deliberatly MeaningLESS Index.

For the DMI I'm totally agree, only the salary can be helpfull and even in this case you can do a lot of errors ...


You have to analyse the players of the others teams with them stats and others :p