I'd just like to point out that this point from Charles came after the salary structure has been changed, i.e. we're now in a situation where salary consists of skill-based portion + adjustment for player distribution in the game (or in other words, at this point a player can change salary even without a second of training in a season).
I personally read it as a quashing of the theory that salary and potential capping use the same formula. So something may impact salary in a big way but capping not as much. As is often with posts from Charles, though, it is open to interpretation.
And obviously, if players are completely identical they will have the same salary .
Obviously, but that was not my point. My point was if you follow certain type of player up until his cap and take a snapshot of when he capped, then you will get the same results every time (at least, that's the results from my 6 player analysis). Of course, if you keep training him after he is capped then that is a different story.
Last edited by HeadPaperPusher at 2/16/2010 8:29:44 AMRun of the Mill Canadian Manager