BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft Picks 1-4

Draft Picks 1-4

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
168268.22 in reply to 168268.1
Date: 1/10/2011 8:38:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
Yer im my opinion, i think people put a higher value on the potential of a young player, rather than their stats.

Also to take into consideration is their age and height. Obviously 18 year old better, but the smart buyers out put bigger value on shorter playerrs for guards, and taller players for centre/pf.

So im my opinion, id go with A-B-C-D, in that order. As long as you get A or B, you should get a bit of dough for them.


This Post:
00
168268.23 in reply to 168268.22
Date: 1/10/2011 12:51:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
Personally, I am a big fan of 4-5 star classified as SF's that are either very tall (for becoming inside men) or very short (for becoming guards). This way I will get a player with secondary skills that with time could turn into a complete player. I also put some emphasis on boxscore, as it is an indicator if it is a multi-talented player or a one dimensional cirkus act.

This Post:
00
168268.24 in reply to 168268.23
Date: 1/10/2011 3:47:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
I believe the role means nothing in draft.
Sometimes it happens to find SG with no OD... and you can't tell me that's a SG.
When I have to choose I just look at:
1) age (19 years old are way less attractive than 18yrs)
2) Skills (5-4 balls are ok. 3 balls only if the potential is high)
3) potential (4-5 balls are great, 3 balls is ok, 2 balls and under no way)
4) height (this is the last one because i usually sell my rookies just to buy one on the market with the right combination of skill\height\potential).

Anyway, I'd go with A B C D, but don't expect anyone of them to be a steal.