BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Motion vs Run and Gun

Motion vs Run and Gun

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
175101.22 in reply to 175101.21
Date: 2/20/2011 1:52:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
I never said that JR is useless...I said that more than 13 is a luxury that i cant afford...

When you want to play inside tactics a player with very high JR will get (and miss) lots of 3pt, and on that case actually its a problem...

This Post:
00
175101.23 in reply to 175101.22
Date: 2/20/2011 4:04:44 AM
Phoenix_Suns
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
177177
I totally agree, a JR skill that gets too high will cause a lot more problems than it would help your team.

This Post:
00
175101.25 in reply to 175101.18
Date: 2/20/2011 7:53:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
JR more than 13 for me is a luxury that personally i cant afford.


I know most managers have a love affair with OD but in many situations a guard with high JR would be the better choice, especially if the player had good passing skills as well.


Why are you emphasising the passing skills - would you elaborate on this? What would the top guard in a outside-constructed team in a level I league look like?

This Post:
11
175101.27 in reply to 175101.26
Date: 2/20/2011 1:07:27 PM
Phoenix_Suns
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
177177
JS: 17 JR: 17
OD: 11 BH: 14
DR: 14 PA: 14
RB: 5 (7)

Weekly salary: ~ 100k (117k) $.

JS: 17 JR: 14
OD: 11 BH: 14
DR: 14 PA: 14
RB: 5 (7)

Weekly salary: ~ 74k (79k) $.

I think this is just not a realistic view on a team´s financial calculation. I doubt that even a competitive first division team is willing or able to pay that amount of money for a backup guard.


AND: I think Steve Nash would be more of a
JS: 20 JR: 17
OD: 7 BH: 17
DR: 15 PA: 20+
RB: 5
player with a weekly salary of ~ 230k $.)

This Post:
00
175101.29 in reply to 175101.27
Date: 2/21/2011 3:52:57 AM
Arizona Cacti
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
I think Steve Nash would be more of a
JS: 20 JR: 17
OD: 7 BH: 17
DR: 15 PA: 20+
RB: 5
player with a weekly salary of ~ 230k $. :))


I'd say this is a really good evaluation and I cant find anything I'd fix. Don't forget the 20+ FT rating as well!

This Post:
00
175101.30 in reply to 175101.29
Date: 2/21/2011 5:58:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
I would go with OD 11-12. He is bad on D but not that bad...

This Post:
00
175101.31 in reply to 175101.9
Date: 2/21/2011 10:15:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
good

Message deleted
Advertisement