BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The Great Micro-nation Debate

The Great Micro-nation Debate

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
66
278268.23 in reply to 278268.22
Date: 4/9/2016 5:54:54 AM
Neverwinter
CGBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
621621
Just one thing:

Losing of national identity is unacceptable.

At very least, keep the national flag next to the team name in this new league, and make the team's draftees of that nationality.

From: Knecht

To: RiP
This Post:
11
278268.25 in reply to 278268.23
Date: 4/9/2016 6:57:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Creating multiple Utopias (fake flag, fake nationality, no NT) would be the worst case imo.

If the micros get merged, I'd dismantle Utopia too and distribute the teams among the new divisions. I'd probably get a second team if it had a real world connection.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
Message deleted
This Post:
55
278268.28 in reply to 278268.1
Date: 4/9/2016 7:12:45 AM
basket haute gironde
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
925925
Second Team:
Antigua Boyz
As Senegal NT coach, i'm not really "hot" with that idea. Senegal is not a big country but we have a little community with a project.
Personnaly, I think that if we want to reduce the disparity between big nations and micro nations, you should save big potential in each micro-nation's draft (by putting them in the market if they are drafted by bots).
To merge all micro-nations would be a big mistake according to me.

This Post:
00
278268.29 in reply to 278268.20
Date: 4/9/2016 7:16:00 AM
Súria Lakers
IV.15
Overall Posts Rated:
33363336
Second Team:
Súria Lakers II
In my opinion, Gilles Bontoux's proposal is the best. But my post goes for another way; Grullo talks about making a question. I think the question should be:

"What are we want to do/change with this?"

I mean, everyone know that the biggest problem is the numbers of users leaving the game. Will this proposal change that? I don't think so.

PKT desde la Temporada 4



Para ver la imagen en mayor tamaño:
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDhxMLDX/e3700169252f336ab3c187ad4773...)
This Post:
55
278268.30 in reply to 278268.28
Date: 4/9/2016 7:38:29 AM
Shahin.Boushehr
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
I posted about merging nations in another topic, but now that it has its own topic, I'm gonna start by copying what I said in the other thread:

Let me just say that the idea of merging the small nations together is absolutely RIDICULOUS !!

It hasn't been officially announced, but everybody knows that it's happening. I don't know about other nations, but the most important thing that is keeping the users in my country (Iran) to keep playing is the nice little community that we have formed throughout the years. Many keep playing the game not because of the game itself, but because of the friends that they have made. As I said, I'm strictly talking about my nation, Iran. It is the friendly rivals and games that keep many in the game. Iran is not a small nation (I mean that geographically), but many of the managers actually meet each other in real life. I myself buy some products of the online store of one of my friends who has a team in the game. I'm saying all this to stress the importance of the community and to tell you that most of the pleasure we get is by interacting with friends. If small nations were to merge, this would be impossible. One of the thing that actually got me to sign up in the first place was that I saw my countries flag in the game. If I wanted to play with managers of some other nations, I would have bought the second team option and joined Utopia !! That's my first and most important point.

Secondly, many managers in my country, including myself, have planned the future of their team with regards to the way our nations is in BB. Some former top league champions have decided to lay low for a while as they are training their trainees, some are going all out for domination in their respective leagues, so merging the nation with other nations would definitely mess up what they have planned for their teams. We Iranians are extremely proud of our country and as small as we may be in BB, we have plans as community to improve our nation in many ways. Our national teams are an example of what we have planned and worked on for so long. We achieved a small portion of what we had in mind a couple of seasons ago as Iran NT became the champions of continental competition for the first time (this was made possible by the efforts of the amazing former B3 champion, Sahand, the manager of I Love Tehran). We are still working on different projects regarding our national teams, youth training, international competition in B3 as I am writing this.

Because of all that I stated above, merging the small nations, or at least my own nation with other countries will only lead to more users leaving the game. This people would be the more serious and more experienced managers such as the two time B3 champion, Misagh Alizadeh, the manager of Venomous Scorpions.

What I'm trying to say is that the idea is completely non-sense and I believe it will have a negative impact on the game.

Instead of merging small nations, why not work on better advertising so there is no need for small nations to merge in the first place !! If there is one of course ....

===================

That was my initial post. I'm completely against the idea. We as a nation have different projects concerning our NT and U21, what we care about is the little flag which represents the country. We're fine with losing, winning, whatever the result may be, as long as it is what we have worked for and put our times in.

Also, no disrespect, but I don't wanna play with a guy from Saudi Arabia, or U.A.E who not only doesn't respect Persians (many stereotypes and insensitive people), but doesn't have a single clue of what I'm talking about. What I mean is the communication problem. I'm one of the few who can speak English in Iran (BB I mean, not the actual country).

This Post:
33
278268.31 in reply to 278268.1
Date: 4/9/2016 7:49:10 AM
Red Devilsss
Bartar
Overall Posts Rated:
288288
I'm disagree
i don't wanna play in other countries or playing with stranger managers

This Post:
22
278268.32 in reply to 278268.28
Date: 4/9/2016 8:15:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
As Senegal NT coach, i'm not really "hot" with that idea. Senegal is not a big country but we have a little community with a project.
Personnaly, I think that if we want to reduce the disparity between big nations and micro nations, you should save big potential in each micro-nation's draft (by putting them in the market if they are drafted by bots).
To merge all micro-nations would be a big mistake according to me.
It is great that you have a project holding you together, unfortunately not all countries have that.

In order to assess which global solution would work best we need to know the specifics of each region and country.

Norway for example, had a vibrant community several seasons ago, but the lack of real competition made it stagnant and it became passive. Having big potential bot players released would be nice, but it would not give us a real competitive situation in the league. Div I schedule(or Div II, depending on how micro the nation is) and the tournament consists mostly of a string of games against bot teams. A merge would give us competition, but I am personally against losing national identity. The nordic countries competition have a great competitive spirit between them, and this is a resource that can be played upon in a merger. The option below that was suggested earlier would, in my opinion be the best for the nordic countries.

4. Micro-nations would be grouped together to form new leagues but the teams keep their current flags (as will their draftees). But the group will share a NT and U21 Team, where players with different flags play together as a team. It would be like option 1., national tournaments would improve, but the teams keep their national identity in some way.


It would be nice to know what group constellations BB are thinking about. Looking at number of users, the history of the region and the already known term Scandinavia, this is a possible group. It includes Norway (44 users), Sweden (111 users), Denmark (70 users), Finland/suomi (230 users) and Iceland (11 users), of the current BB countries. The languages are, although possible to understand partly between some of the different countries, not a good idea to merge into one forum. Unless it is a compromise with one Scandinavia forum in english, and subforums/threads in the language of each country.

Knowing approx how many users BB are thinking for the new regions would allow users in those areas to suggest the best constellations for their area.

Advertisement