BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Re-modeling Arenas...

Re-modeling Arenas... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
282325.22 in reply to 282325.21
Date: 9/27/2016 7:17:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
- As I said, "too". Meaning, 'additionally'. I think you're getting a wee bit pedantic now...

Mate, I never said anything about you not being able to agree with someone else's suggestion. If I am coming across as pedantic its because you keep misinterpreting what I am saying.


- "adding arena costs"... err... huh? It doesn't add a single cent to "arena costs" - it's completely voluntary, and (as you've pointed out) not really necessary for a manager.

I wasn't referring to your suggestion. I was talking about the suggestion that arenas should start decaying and require everyone to "pay for upkeep". Again, just clearing up your misinterpretation.

This Post:
00
282325.23 in reply to 282325.22
Date: 9/28/2016 8:50:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Sheesh dude... I am beginning to suspect that you are trolling. I don't know you from stone - and I gave you the benefit of the doubt earlier. You were civil, but that's eroding, huh? Trolling, is that indeed what you're doing? I guess I should ask some I know within the Aussie community...

Anyway... to play along.

- As I said, "too". Meaning, 'additionally'. I think you're getting a wee bit pedantic now...

Mate, I never said anything about you not being able to agree with someone else's suggestion. If I am coming across as pedantic its because you keep misinterpreting what I am saying.

Erm... I'd suggest it isn't so much "misinterpretation", as much as what you're saying being incredibly misleading. Whether by intent, or not... isn't really relevant.

I agree with someone on a suggestion... you immediately jump in with:
This is a completely different concept to what you described.

Slightly aggressive... but no matter. Still, definitely a response to the negative, and who gives a flier if the suggestions DIFFERENT to what I suggested? So... ?



- "adding arena costs"... err... huh? It doesn't add a single cent to "arena costs" - it's completely voluntary, and (as you've pointed out) not really necessary for a manager.

I wasn't referring to your suggestion. I was talking about the suggestion that arenas should start decaying and require everyone to "pay for upkeep". Again, just clearing up your misinterpretation.

Yet again, there's no *misinterpretation*.


The economy is unstable, but the arena system isn't broken. The problem with making changes that affect finances is that it's hard to predict how far it will go. If the increased salary floor and hoarding tax are slowly working, adding arena costs could see the solution become a different problem.


You respond to something I've said, and apparently the second half of what you're saying isn't in regards to me? So... it's a wild tangent. 'K. Or at best, a tenuous link to someone else, without actually acknowledging you're changing topic midstream. Again... 'k.

Look... as I said: no beef with you, but you seem intent to cause someone. I get it. I think by now we all get it: you don't like the suggestion. Cool beans, I'll cope. Move along?

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan