BuzzerBeater Forums

I have been in the game for quite some time. It’s not a dinosaur, but still not many players play from season 17. Therefore, I understand the mechanism of the game and predict it. He is not so complicated that I was something very puzzled. But in this case, I'm just stunned by the outcome of the game. Such an outcome defies any logic. Between the starting lineups just the gap in the difference of skills and abilities. There should have been complete domination of one team over another, but in the end there was some strange leapfrog.

I rarely chat on the forums. But in this case I simply could not restrain myself, I want to get a clear answer about what happened. I heard only two versions, but they did not convince me. I put up for sale the players who played. For everyone to see from the skills.

It should be clear that the matter is not in passes - the average of the starting lineup is 6.8. This is a very good result against players 9-12k.

It is also not a matter of ratings. The rating is so bad just because of the bench with two bad players. But my questions are exactly to the starting lineups. Why, when there were 4 players on the court at once, who are many times superior to the opponent, there were no quite logical jerks?

Well, everyone has long known such a joke when a player with a long-range shot is put on the center position and he is against the center without external defense, he is shooting from the perimeter. But this is not the case.

you played with 4 players
sometimes the 5th one will make the difference (like going 0-10 while the 2 opponent SG score 33 points)

just use a 5k player who doesn't completely suck like your 2k one probably does

I know perfectly well that my position was weaker than that of my opponent. The question is different: why then 4 my other positions did not dominate, although there the difference in the players is much larger than the difference in SG?

Super komentaras! (y)

I cannot remember where I read it, but what probably happened is the other 4 players are constantly double teamed while your SG is left wide open.

I also think tactics played a part here. You need more outside scoring in Inside Isolation so that the isolated player can have space. The isolated player will find double team since perimeter players can be left open. Also, with not that good passing, the isolated player will not effectively pass out of a double team. I think you can win easily with look inside.

Also, the difference in the skill of your other players are not that much larger than the difference in SG. There is diminishing returns for every skill point difference, so that the difference between pitiful (2) and atrocious (1) is larger than prodigious (16) and marvelous (15).


Last edited by Greedy at 3/9/2019 6:45:18 PM