BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make the best players actually desirable

Make the best players actually desirable

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
158188.221 in reply to 158188.214
Date: 10/25/2010 11:53:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Yes, it's true, one player is not enough. But at the moment I'm happy we have Hana, few seasons ago we didn't have anyone. Maybe in few season we can have 3 or 4 similar players. I think if you have good community and not high risk of bad game shape than 5 PG/SG, 3 SF and 5 PF/C (each of them able to play as a starter) with some little bit worse backups can be enough.
Both of them (player 1, player 2) are very "ugly" in my eyes, 27 and 28 sum of outside skills it's far away from our players. It's totally unacceptable for me even if they have tripple 20 IS, ID, REB. Last week we played away match in Greece without Hana and it was very close game (came to overtime). As I said before our NT is improving step by step, there is no need tu hurry. I know it will take many seasons before we reach the top NT's.

I understand your strategy...but I have to warn you that the main risk for your Nt,pursuing this way,is to not ever have all together enough players with nearly the same primaries and better secondary skills than other NT's players to compete against them
P.S. It's a shame that L.H. didn't shift some of his handling and driving levels to inside skills or JR/OD

This Post:
00
158188.222 in reply to 158188.221
Date: 10/25/2010 12:48:41 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11871187
Second Team:
Jirkov
No warning needed. There are many difficulties on the way and finally I can end without success. But there is for me only way I'm ready to use and there is no chance to talk ouf of it ;-)

This Post:
00
158188.224 in reply to 158188.223
Date: 10/25/2010 2:07:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I think that while is NT at different situation than clubs (wel it isnt about ballancing wage and effectivity), the rules for NT players have to be different as well.

Well, you get for such players better merchandise which kind of compensate its specific needs, but that also means more NT players you have, more money you get. But Im sure that fans doesnt have so deep pockets, so they want to pay twice more just because you have two players like this.

Thats the explanation, but the reason for the following suggestion is even different. In order to keep things fair for these teams which have no such luck (ability or will) to grow NT players, doesnt make any sense to give the advantage (financial bonus) to more than 1 player like that into the team.

That means if only 1 guy would have bonus like that, you can come up with the solution which will mean that you dont have to pay for NT player almost anything, as long as he is in the national team.

Last edited by aigidios at 10/25/2010 2:08:59 PM

This Post:
00
158188.225 in reply to 158188.224
Date: 10/26/2010 1:57:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I think that while is NT at different situation than clubs (wel it isnt about ballancing wage and effectivity), the rules for NT players have to be different as well.

Well, you get for such players better merchandise which kind of compensate its specific needs, but that also means more NT players you have, more money you get. But Im sure that fans doesnt have so deep pockets, so they want to pay twice more just because you have two players like this.

Thats the explanation, but the reason for the following suggestion is even different. In order to keep things fair for these teams which have no such luck (ability or will) to grow NT players, doesnt make any sense to give the advantage (financial bonus) to more than 1 player like that into the team.

That means if only 1 guy would have bonus like that, you can come up with the solution which will mean that you dont have to pay for NT player almost anything, as long as he is in the national team.

You come up with the solution that you can't have NT players on your team,which is a bad idea

This Post:
00
158188.226 in reply to 158188.225
Date: 10/26/2010 2:36:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Thats not the reason for the idea, it could be fixed anyhow else. I would like to see the advantage for my team, but I know as well that there will be always someone smarther than me to get from that advantage more.

This Post:
00
158188.227 in reply to 158188.226
Date: 10/26/2010 4:40:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Thats not the reason for the idea, it could be fixed anyhow else. I would like to see the advantage for my team, but I know as well that there will be always someone smarther than me to get from that advantage more.

???

This Post:
00
158188.228 in reply to 158188.227
Date: 10/26/2010 4:54:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Well, the game is about thinking what advantage you can have against others, isnt it?

This Post:
00
158188.229 in reply to 158188.224
Date: 10/26/2010 9:34:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
It's not about advantages, it's about pride. You get a little extra merchandising to balance the fact that you probably have to make some sacrifices with other young players. But NT's already have good players, so there is no need to give even more incentive to train a NT guy.
I like the idea of building a NT with efficient salaries and players not bouncing from one team to the other. I think it is a good long-term plan for international success. It's just a matter of convincing the people who elect the coach, and building good relationships with NT trainers. NT training should be the opposite of farming, it should be about training the most efficient player at the cheapest price. If you do that, you help your club, and if the NT coach is one with a long-term plan, he will be interested.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
158188.230 in reply to 158188.228
Date: 10/27/2010 12:27:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Yeah,but this doesn't mean that you have to hit the other's advantages in this way,you should try to put your players in NT(o collect money to buy them) to have more advantages than the others,don't you agree? ;D
P.S. I don't think that teams of a III division all over the world can have so many NT players in their roster,it would be strange

This Post:
00
158188.231 in reply to 158188.229
Date: 10/27/2010 4:07:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Ok, there is a thing you call a "pride", but dont you think that NT mechanism could be more user-friendly to people who actually doesnt think NT? You are describing everything so romantic that maybe you cannot see that most effective way of building up NT team is at current conditions made by farms, not by a "pride" teams, because it means that you have to sacrifice everything, money, results, everything.

Last edited by aigidios at 10/27/2010 4:23:25 PM

Advertisement