BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.225 in reply to 14900.224
Date: 11/26/2008 12:38:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Could be stamina issues - your last game saw your defense get steadily worse each quarter.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
14900.226 in reply to 14900.225
Date: 11/26/2008 12:40:50 PM
Guma Terror
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
3030


yes maybe no other explaination

but what about going only 3 times to the foul line ?

against the team that is my rival ?

supposedly should be more physical or something a game between rivals more fouls whatever

From: waggyrob

This Post:
00
14900.227 in reply to 14900.221
Date: 11/29/2008 8:19:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Wake Forest almost gave up a score in 2 seconds recently as well.

This Post:
00
14900.229 in reply to 14900.228
Date: 11/29/2008 4:39:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I really can't understand why I've lost my last 2 league games ((8815099), (8815107)). I played motion against look inside having much better stats then the opposite teams. I can't help noticing that since the change of inside tactics by the BB staff that inside tactics have now improved, in my opinion, excessively. In the second game my ID and RB were higher then opponent's IS and RB also my OS was much higher than his OD. A game that I expected to win easily by a large margin I lost by as much as 20 points. I have to admit that before the changes my team has won a few game's against IS teams that should have been losses. I also admit that there was a gap between inside vs outside tactics but I think that the changes might have moved the gap to the other side giving the insiders the edge. Any one has similar experience? I think "Inside vs outside tactics after the changes" might be a good topic for a new thread. What do you think?

This Post:
00
14900.230 in reply to 14900.229
Date: 11/29/2008 4:41:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Match-ups are more important than ratings. Giving up three extremely high PP100 will usually lose you a lot of games, and you did that in both cases.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
14900.231 in reply to 14900.230
Date: 11/29/2008 4:49:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
what do you exactly mean by PP100 matchups?

This Post:
00
14900.232 in reply to 14900.231
Date: 11/29/2008 4:53:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
what do you exactly mean by PP100 matchups?

Points per 100 possessions is the stat that actually evaluates the quality of the shots taken from each position during the game. If you inspect the two game you posted, in both of them your opponents have three position where they took really good shots (100+ points per 100 possessions, sometimes even 110+), while you usually had only one. As I said, this is a quick way to lose lots of games.

Team ratings really only tell you half of the story. They are useful when you're trying to evaluate a team in a game you didn't participate.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
14900.233 in reply to 14900.232
Date: 11/29/2008 5:00:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
how can I improve my PP100 and lower my opponents PP100 in a game?

This Post:
00
14900.234 in reply to 14900.233
Date: 11/29/2008 5:23:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
how can I improve my PP100 and lower my opponents PP100 in a game?

Make sure all of your players have both offensive and defensive skills usually does it

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 11/29/2008 5:23:28 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
From: Roel_V
This Post:
00
14900.235 in reply to 14900.234
Date: 11/30/2008 2:41:01 AM
BC Tienen
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
11
It seems I can't find an explanation for these 2 games:
(8594359), (8594373)
Maybe someone else does?

Advertisement