BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Remove draft

Remove draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
106376.23 in reply to 106376.21
Date: 8/26/2009 11:02:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
And so?We talk about a re-distribution of the same "information points" than there are now.To invest an average sum of money in scouters could don't give ant advantage,if your scouters spent their information points on useless players(1-2 star rating,the major part of 3 star ratings).the advantage of the proposal will be for everything,because also who spent 0 on draft will have better second observations.But obviously,who spent more in the drfat,making a strategicla choice,will have more advantages

This Post:
11
106376.24 in reply to 106376.23
Date: 8/26/2009 11:15:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
I have to agree with the italians: why the hell should my scout observe a 1 star player twice again just to tell me: "hey, he's not only awful, but he's also 19 years old and look, he has the potencial to serve chips in the arena"

There should be a better system regarding the re-scouting.



This Post:
00
106376.25 in reply to 106376.23
Date: 8/26/2009 12:03:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
if you have better informations per point, the result is that you spend less in draft because you have even with few point decent informations(or maybe everyone will go on 5k because he get nearly everything relevant out of it). Now the additional point give you in average much more and thats why also more better informations.

And huge investment just give you the bad information because you can not use the point sensefull in the end.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/26/2009 12:05:59 PM

This Post:
00
106376.26 in reply to 106376.25
Date: 8/26/2009 12:48:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
You'll have better information only about the "second information point",so who spent less on draft will have the second observation on the few good player that he see with the first informations(4-5-6 players),who spent more on the draft will have better information about the major part of the good players that he see with the first information(14-15 players),and so on.
If you are low in choices,with the actual system you have all the interest to spend 0 on draft,because you will have in every case bad second observations,so you had to be very very very lucky to draft a decent-not a future star-player,and also if you draft a player which you can sell for 50k,you earn something,if you draft only weak player,no problem,you don't spend nothing.In the new way,you have some interest to spend somethng on the draft,because you could know well a good number of decent player,and you can manage to draft some of them also with a low choice in the draft


Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/26/2009 12:49:04 PM

This Post:
00
106376.27 in reply to 106376.26
Date: 8/26/2009 1:16:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
for me a 2-3 good informations enough, but what is with team in inactive leagues, who even could gamble with 40k investments today?

With your system, you get maybe no more usefull infomation with the step betwen ten and 20k and very good infos with 5k. And this is also bad, because it makes the whole range nearly senseless.

This Post:
00
106376.28 in reply to 106376.27
Date: 8/26/2009 4:28:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
who is in an incative league is lucky,he could spendo 5k week and draft the best player
Do you understand italian language?this is the proposal that an italian user made in our national forum
(31676.848)
This system would be however randomized and it doesn't change so much the actual drafting system,evaluating the expenses for the scouters

"The proposal is that the probability of a second observation will depend from the result of the first observation
For example:
- a player with 5 star rating has the 60% of probability of a second observation
- 4 star 40%
- 3 star 25%
- 2 star 15%
- 1 star 5%"

This Post:
00
106376.29 in reply to 106376.28
Date: 8/26/2009 4:38:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
he posted this suggestion in english forum too, when you decrease the number of picks too it will be fine - maybe even more then actual to made the 20 and 40k system more attractive ;)

Because the overall quality is less system because of the view picks the expense draft seems to be more "workable".

This Post:
00
106376.30 in reply to 106376.29
Date: 8/26/2009 5:32:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I dont' agree about reducing the number of picks.This would be a compromise to convince the people who think that actual system is good(without showing any kind of argument...)as you,to have better second information,which is the way to transform draft in an attractive thing.Infact less information wasn't insert in the proposal made in italian forum,because the most part of the users agree with that

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/26/2009 5:33:26 PM

This Post:
00
106376.31 in reply to 106376.30
Date: 8/26/2009 7:56:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
in a atraktive thing for people who pay nothing or 5k without any argument ;)

For me they only add to add other arguments in the rules, to make the current thing realistic. Like that the double viewed make a try out(where you don't get everytimes the best), or comes from your local region.


This Post:
00
106376.32 in reply to 106376.31
Date: 8/26/2009 10:14:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
The #1 thing that needs to be changed with a new draft option is that the people that pay more for better draftees should be able to see the second stats of better players. Right now, people are paying minimum and getting big-time drafts! This is not fair for the people that are paying a lot of money. (I am not bias, since I only spent 10K per week.)

This Post:
00
106376.33 in reply to 106376.31
Date: 8/27/2009 6:01:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
what kind of thought is that?So,if for example the GE will be bugged,they have only to explain to thte people"hey,the Ge is buggy,don't worry" and not working to make it better?

Advertisement