BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Sverige > Maxlön för potential

Maxlön för potential

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
112974.23 in reply to 112974.22
Date: 9/29/2009 8:55:13 AM
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
Jo GM-JuicePats har jag bråkat med själv. Verkar tycka om att halvt idiotförklara användares inlägg utan att vara säker på att hans egna argument ens är korrekta. Borde inte idiotförklara andras argument oavsett, även om det är just korkade påståenden.

This Post:
00
112974.24 in reply to 112974.22
Date: 9/30/2009 12:01:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
Jag har inte så mycket mer att tillföra i den här tråden, vill bara tillägga att jag gjorde ett försök att få GM-Koz att berätta var han fått sina uppgifter ifrån.

No. It was in a forum message from about the time when potentials were introduced.

> I see all over the forum statements from you about BB-Charles saying something like:
> "The cap is not based directly on skills, it's better to think of it as a limit to salary."
> I have now spent a lot of time, searching the forums for that quote, but i just cant find it. Do you have a link or something?

/Mannen
This Post:
00
112974.25 in reply to 112974.24
Date: 10/2/2009 2:29:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Hur är alla i dag?

Ber om ursäkt för denna dåliga översättningen, görs detta genom en maskin.

Om du har problem med en viss GM, kan du kontakta oss direkt. Klagande i ett forum som vi sällan ser är inte meningsfullt att lösa eventuella problem du kan ha.

Detta är inte Hattrick - Vi uppmanar användare att BB-Mail GMs bör de ha en fråga att ta upp med att GM - civilrättsligt, naturligtvis.

Om du har några frågor, vänligen BB-mail me.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
112974.26 in reply to 112974.25
Date: 10/3/2009 7:28:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Engilish
I really don't get your message (part of it probably because the auto translation is really, really bad and hard to understand, so you might consider posting an original in english, which will make it easier to understand).

What we are discussing is the creadibility of different statements in order to understand how the potential roof works. There is no discussion at all about how any specific "case" has been handled by a GM (or anyother), only a discussion on how much we can tust different public statements that has been made on the forums. For some reason, correct or not, a few of us do not really put too much trust in the statements from some GMs while we trust statements from others more.

I really hope, and believe, that it is permitted to discuss credibility of statements by users independently on if they are BBs, GMs or an average Joe like me.

Svenska
Jag förstår verkligen inte ditt meddelande (antagligen delvis för att automatöversättningen är riktigt, riktigt dålig och svår att förstå, så du skulle kunna posta ett original på engelska så att det blir lättare att förstå).

Vad vi diskuterar är trovärdigheten i olika uttalanden för att förstå hor potentialtaket fungerar. Det pågår ingen diskussion alls om hur något enskild "ärende" har handlagts av en GM (elle någon annan), bara en diskussion om hur mycket vi kan tro på publika uttalanden som gjorts på forumen. Av någon anledning, korrekt eller inte, så sätter några av oss inte speciellt hög tillit i uttalanden från vissa GMs, medans vi litar mer på uttalanden från andra.

Jag hoppas verkligen, och tror, att det är tillåtet att diskutera trovärdigheten i uttalanden från användare oberoende om dom är BB, GM, eller medelsvenssons som jag.

Last edited by chespirito at 10/3/2009 7:29:06 AM

This Post:
00
112974.27 in reply to 112974.26
Date: 10/3/2009 8:10:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
Well spoken! I was thinking about writing something similar. I agree with everything u said, its excactly my thoughts about all this, which rly aint nothing at all.

Last edited by sku88an at 10/3/2009 8:11:15 AM

This Post:
00
112974.28 in reply to 112974.26
Date: 10/3/2009 10:28:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
I reacted exactly the same way as you, then I read the thread again and found one message that doesnt stop at discussing credibility. I´m quite sure JP reacted to that post and not the discussion in general.

Last edited by Mannen at 10/3/2009 10:59:05 AM

/Mannen
This Post:
00
112974.29 in reply to 112974.26
Date: 10/5/2009 7:36:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I wanted to post in Swedish to respect your nations forum and it's local language, no disrespect was intended at all.

And yes, Mannen is correct, my post was directed more at a single post and not the nature of the discussion itself.

My point is that we're not ogres, we're human, and if you have a concern, please bring it to us - we're here to make the game as enjoyable as possible within our limitations.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
112974.30 in reply to 112974.29
Date: 10/6/2009 2:11:45 AM
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
The concern is that you keep writing "will not happen" and other responses that are more than just ungentle. The other GM that been mentioned also has a tendency in that direction.

Why if someone gives a suggestion can't you just write something like "thanks for the suggestion but at the moment is that not likely to happen" or "maybe not a suggestion I am too found of and at the moment it is not within the plans and I doubt that it will be as well". Because if someone gives a suggestion they deserve to be treated in a respectful way no matter how stupid the suggestion is.

You have as well noticed last days that what could not happen has happened so calm down a bit with responses even if you got the truth which maybe is the case as well.

And I am not doubting that you and other GMs are making a good and unpaid job to help us make this site even better and we are many that really likes this game.

From: Mannen

This Post:
00
112974.31 in reply to 112974.30
Date: 11/5/2009 1:52:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
(117670.29)
Lite diskusion om potential, tidigare t tråden finns även en reviderad verision till siffrorna jokehim postade först i dennna tråd.

/Mannen