BuzzerBeater Forums

That is weird.
You know the income for my semi finals game was 29k ??

I guess in leagues where everyone has big arenas the income might be a lot, but tell me... how much are there around? 10? I think not even that much. So in most cases....
;)

That is weird.
You know the income for my semi finals game was 29k ??

But you played in a pretty small stadion with standard prices, i think with home court you would earn 200 a game too ;)

And i think the size of the arena corresporents with the salarys you pay for ... i'm pretty sure i got some Problems with a 5000 Arena and my rooster.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 5/3/2008 12:13:16 PM

correct, but when a team needs to buy a player, the whole world can bid, so then it stops being relative. Also when you want to expand, the price is the same for everyone, so less money is less.
But then again a player you can buy for 500k would probably have the same value as a 75k player he can buy, which is obviously not going to strengthen your, or his team, so in the end it stays little money...

But we are drifting away again. It always comes to the same point, 5th placed teams do not get revenue and find it highly unfair.
When I started playing I got a team in 5th place and the season just ended. So I know how 5th teams feel, but it is just the way it is...

Don't get me wrong I won't mind if they change it, for suggestions: see numerous posts all over the forums where I repeated myself over and over about good solutions for this 'problem'.
But also understand me if I tell that I don't see anything realy wrong with the way it is now... Teams that 'need' this money to keep their head above water, teams that need wages to be payed back because they loose to much money when they don't get revenue for 2 or 3 weeks, are obviously doing something wrong economically, and changing the way the play-off season works now is not going to solve that problem.