BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Hall-of-famer players for a more equal, fair and competitive Buzzerbeater

Hall-of-famer players for a more equal, fair and competitive Buzzerbeater

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
315119.23 in reply to 315119.22
Date: 7/2/2022 6:27:59 AM
Hortatus
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
13021302
Rather, one could think of a drafting market release with a certain potential for smaller nations of tot users.
This would avoid "waste" and would not benefit any club.
But the nations that are part of "nations of .." would still be penalized.

Anche tu a caccia di "Riconoscimenti"?! Vieni in federazione: Achievements hunters (fedid=19269) (solo per supporter, se non lo sei e hai dubbi chiedi pure, spero di poter esserti di aiuto)
This Post:
11
315119.24 in reply to 315119.21
Date: 7/2/2022 7:36:28 PM
C.D Leyenda
DIMAYOR BB
Overall Posts Rated:
888888
Second Team:
CD Histórico
It's not a bad idea that high potential Legends (10+), HoF (10), and MVP (9), even superstars (8), chosen by bot teams go up for sale on the same day of the draft, as free agents. Looking for new opportunities to improve their skills, because they know their potential and want better facilities and coaching staff to develop.

Micro and small nations with more bot teams might have a better chance of finding something on the TL

Best regards!

En Tierra de Leyendas y Gigantes
This Post:
00
315119.27 in reply to 315119.1
Date: 7/13/2022 3:22:00 AM
Team Payabang
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
Dont forget BB-Marin's reply from another thread...

(314977.13)
Why not auto sell the drafters'bot players at 0 price?
In this mode we don't lose good players or nt prospect...


We'll consider this as a valid solution, in case the talent pool reduces a lot. We might not release all draftees this way, maybe a smaller selection (as much as we determine is needed) based equally on skill and a random factor.



It would help too... the only question is will how will the pool of roster be collected and distributed.... Per Country? Globally? or just like the Utopian Double Nationality Rules? or Equal numbers of representatives per Country?

This Post:
22
315119.28 in reply to 315119.27
Date: 7/16/2022 11:56:00 PM
Johns Creek Wave
III.4
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Second Team:
Holly Springs Haggis
One of the places where BB missed the boat was when they created Utopia in the first place.

In another manager game that I played, you were able to buy 2nd teams in whatever country you wanted. I live in the US, but my preference would be to have a 2nd team in Scotland or Ireland rather than Utopia. I am sure there are other players like me who have an affinity for some of the less represented countries in the game. It would have be a natural way for players to help with NTs.

The problem with Utopia is twofold. As a manager, you start so low, it takes a long time to develop your club. So while you may have a player you want to develop, you probably don't have the facilities to do it. And if you sell the player, you probably won't get as much for him as you would for a US player. And there is no guarantee that the manager who buys that player will do a better job of developing him.

As a result, even though there may be more players available, they will probably be half-assed developed. So it still doesn't help smaller countries that much.

Ultimately, it's an impossible thing to balance. Short of having a World Cup Soccer style approach where someone may be born in one country and play for another because of heritage, I don't see a way to balance this. Unless you want to "naturalize" players (i.e. - a US player becomes a Mexican player after playing in Mexico for X number of seasons), I don't see a way to do it. And that would open a whole different can of worms.

When I first started following Soccer in the late 80s, people joked the FAI stood for "Find Another Irishman". Maybe that's what you need to do

Last edited by Gaillimh at 7/16/2022 11:57:14 PM