BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > B3 Qualification Rules

B3 Qualification Rules

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
42032.23 in reply to 42032.3
Date: 8/11/2008 6:01:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
since that guarantees that 1 spot will always be theoretically available to every single team in the league pyramid.


thats true, every single team already has the theoretical chance to win the cup final. thats enough!
league championship is a far more important than the cup tournament, thus the runner up of the final should participate!!!


First of all, it is currently a standard practice in a number of European competitions.


impossible to compare though, since the runner up of the championship is playing in a higher league, than the cup winner. that again shows the importance of cup and championship...

Last edited by Huzzel at 8/11/2008 6:05:54 AM

From: Thijs

This Post:
00
42032.24 in reply to 42032.22
Date: 8/11/2008 6:02:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
If there is 2 two differents teams, then 2 qualified, if the winner is the same team, then only one qualified team.


I think every country should have 2 representatives in B3, exept for 1: the country with the current cup holder may send 3 teams (B3 winner, league winner and cup winner).

And as B3 has a knock out system, I feel that real cup fighters should have a chance to compete. So if League champ and cup winner are the same in a country, allow the cup runner up to compete in B3 rather then the league runner up.



From: zisvan

This Post:
00
42032.25 in reply to 42032.24
Date: 8/11/2008 6:44:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
I agree with one thing: last B3's winner should be automaticcaly qualified [;)]

From: Rambo

This Post:
00
42032.27 in reply to 42032.10
Date: 8/11/2008 8:24:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
I agree with the solution of having the cup runner up play but the logic you used is no more suited for the cup as it is for the league. The second best team is not guaranteed to be the other team in the finals. Imagine if the 2nd best team played the eventual champion in the first round?

From: raonne

This Post:
00
42032.28 in reply to 42032.27
Date: 8/11/2008 9:19:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
I agree with the solution of having the cup runner up play but the logic you used is no more suited for the cup as it is for the league. The second best team is not guaranteed to be the other team in the finals. Imagine if the 2nd best team played the eventual champion in the first round?

The thing is that the pool for runner-up in the cup is much bigger, includes everyone. In the final of the Cup teams can come from anywhere, while the runner-up of the league comes from a pool that doesn't even include all teams in that league, because of the conference format of the playoffs.

To the others: Anyway, I don't think a country should be punished for having the same team winning both tournaments. So we definitely should have 2 teams for each country. Why should Italy have an advantage over Portugal, Brasil, USA and Canada (for example)? No, does not make sense. Two teams per country is a must. Cup runner-up is simply the best solution, but the important thing is that each country has 2 spots.

Last edited by raonne at 8/11/2008 9:20:27 AM

From: Pieriku

This Post:
00
42032.29 in reply to 42032.15
Date: 8/11/2008 9:30:05 AM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Yeah right, and the Champions League is filled with just the national league soccer champions of Europe and none of them became champs undeserved.... If B3 is only for the best teams in the world, why invite teams from, lets say Equator and Dominican Republic (no offense)? I think the current method of league champions and cup winners/runners up is a fair one. If you have made it all the way thru the knock out systeem only to lose against the national champion (to be), you must have a pretty decent team...


That's exactly the reason why I don't like the Champions' League and why I much prefered the former Champions' Cup.

From: Pieriku

This Post:
00
42032.30 in reply to 42032.25
Date: 8/11/2008 9:32:48 AM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
I agree with one thing: last B3's winner should be automaticcaly qualified [;)]


Yes, because he won a tough competition with his team. It's possible that he priviligiated this competition to the League and the Cup.

From: Pieriku

This Post:
00
42032.31 in reply to 42032.28
Date: 8/11/2008 9:35:50 AM
Olympus Team
IV.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
To the others: Anyway, I don't think a country should be punished for having the same team winning both tournaments. So we definitely should have 2 teams for each country. Why should Italy have an advantage over Portugal, Brasil, USA and Canada (for example)? No, does not make sense. Two teams per country is a must. Cup runner-up is simply the best solution, but the important thing is that each country has 2 spots.


I would not consider France (my country) as being punished if there was only one team qualified to the BBB. He won the Cup and the League, therefore he is the only team that deserves to qualify to this competition.

From: raonne

This Post:
00
42032.33 in reply to 42032.31
Date: 8/11/2008 9:39:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
I would not consider France (my country) as being punished if there was only one team qualified to the BBB. He won the Cup and the League, therefore he is the only team that deserves to qualify to this competition.

Well, that is your opinion. In the meanwhile we have several other people in other leagues that feel as being punished or that this is unfair. I won both League and Cup in my country and I agree with them.

Advertisement