BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis 2

Training Speed Analysis 2

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
78242.235 in reply to 78242.234
Date: 12/16/2009 2:01:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
But even if that were so, wouldn't it all even out in the end, since higher RB would in turn increase the training speed of ID or SB?
This seems like a circular argument. The "speed-up" is probably relative, anyhow.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 12/16/2009 2:02:06 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
78242.236 in reply to 78242.234
Date: 12/16/2009 10:25:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I have made a short and rudimentary example for you, according to the first post of this thread.

Training schedule A: 14 weeks of C/PF Rebounding training. 9.4 pops in RB, 1.4 pops in IS and ID. Assuming 18 year old with beginning levels of respectable in the four main big man skills, after 14 weeks he would look like this:
IS strong+
ID strong+
RB prodigious
SB respectable

Training schedule B: seven week rotation C training in IS, ID, SB and C/PF training in RB as follows:
IS, ID, RB, IS, ID, RB, SB. After 14 weeks, same trainee would look like this:
IS prominent ++
ID prominent ++
RB prominent
SB strong ++
JS skill ++
DR skill++

+ means sublevels less than 50%
++ means sublevels more than 50%

I will let you decide which player would help your team more.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78242.237 in reply to 78242.236
Date: 12/17/2009 1:03:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I see now thanks. I did notice that one of my PFs with a lower ID averaged less rebounds than the other big men with higher ID even though RB is similar. I'll be doing PF/C for training schedule B, but I imagine that B would still be the better option.

What would be an acceptable difference between the lowest and highest skills?

Last edited by Agent L at 12/17/2009 1:06:24 AM

This Post:
00
78242.238 in reply to 78242.237
Date: 12/17/2009 1:44:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
That is a good question. I don't know the answer. Most of my players are within two levels in their main skills. My starting center has a bit wider margin.

If you trainee is 18 and you want him to be a great player for your team, you should figure a training schedule that is four seasons long and stick to it. Aside from the main skills, you should give your center some one on one for forwards, some passing, and for sure free throws. Big men shoot more free throws in general (especially if you play inside tactics) and they can be the difference. My advice would be to mix those other trainings in occasionally, in place of SB.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
78242.240 in reply to 78242.1
Date: 12/18/2009 9:13:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
The passing info in this post is cut off a bit.

Anyone care to share their experiences with passing training?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
78242.242 in reply to 78242.241
Date: 12/20/2009 4:02:25 AM
This Post:
00
78242.243 in reply to 78242.242
Date: 12/30/2009 4:51:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
can anyone tell me when the softcap of the potential takes effect?

This Post:
00
78242.244 in reply to 78242.243
Date: 12/30/2009 4:58:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
Well, that all depends on the potential you're talking about now doesn't it? ;)

I don't think anyone has gotten any of them down to an exact science yet though.

Advertisement