but why are so mayn inside team get qualified, and compete to the next round? If they where incompetive, with insidetactics but play them as main attack?
search me.
But if jbmcrock still plays base offense nothing is impossible... I thought he had learnt 6 seasons ago after losing his first BBB against a weaker team (6045735)
Bit harsh - the game engine has evolved a lot since then.
When you have 1 off games its just down to who plays well on the night (random factor). Most of the top 50 teams have the capability to beat each other if they have HCA & if you add to this your main guy(s) going 8 from 10 or 1 from 14 then this is going to determine the outcome NOT who set the right tactics.
I cant believe that the average PG v PG showdown or PF v PF with the top teams gives enough of a mismatch to see one player dominate. In many cases the better player can just underperform and negate the training/skill advantage you think you deserve or have created. It is true that perfect tactics will exaggerate any gap in skill should their be a mismatch but with teams capable of scoring between 65-95 simply dependent on if they play well on the day (I consider this different to GS which I believe just helps the odds in your favour and nothing more) then when 2 bohemoths match up the outcome is just random.
Now that teams have reached the point where they cant effectively improve their ratings without going over budget the only way to discover the best in BB will be to play over a longer period of time so that the luck/random has a chance to even out.