And again I find myself asking why is Perpete so fond of an election that is practically not an election...
It's an election in many countries. Elsewhere, it's a lottery, as it would be with a scrambling vote.
And I didn't understand your last sentence. Could you explain it for a poor fool like me ?
I'll explain again;
Scrambling the order of nominees will make it that each nominee will be ordered first (for example) the exact amount of times.
Hence, your point about voting to the same person who is first is void.
What it will do is that some of those who will be forced to vote will get accuaintance with it and take action.
It will make the election less volunrable to unfair voting variant.