BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > No "*" for WO in NT games?

No "*" for WO in NT games?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
228764.24 in reply to 228764.23
Date: 10/25/2012 8:54:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
It looks like there doesn't exist better motivation to fix loophole than exploitation of this loophole ;-)

This Post:
00
228764.25 in reply to 228764.14
Date: 10/25/2012 2:24:23 PM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83078307
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
I agree, it is a loophole, but a well known one, that NT managers are well aware of. To fix it now and change the standings would mean a big change in the game environment that would affect all the decisions made by the NT managers. I stand by my decision; there will be no changes in the standings but you can expect some changes starting next season. Changes that will fix or render the loophole worthless to use.


I'm sorry that I'll ignore your warning about discussing this issue any further. And please ban me or throw me out of BB for all I care. It's nothing against your work - I appreciate it a great deal that you're so present here in the forums. But it is just not true that NT managers were aware of this loophole. I have been quite active during my 4 seasons as a U21-Manager and I've never stumbled across this issue in the forums. And in all the competitions that I took part in with the U21 a forfeit was never an issue for me. Especially not since in my opinion every NT should field some players in competitions - but that's besides the point. As Fresh24 pointed out, it was the exploiting of a bug. Which should be punised in my opinion. The only "fair" solution in my opinion would be to let neither Germany U21 nor England U21 advance to the next round and letting Bulgaria have a "free" game. Otherwise it seems to me that England is awarded for exploiting a bug. And I agree with Fresh24 that I would - given this precedent - think twice about reporting a bug that would otherwise help me.

This whole situation makes me very angry - and it's not any more about Germany U21 advancing to the next round but as a principle.

And finally @B.B.King: I play the game since season 11 and I don't remember not seeing any "*" in the standings. You play the game longer than I do - but for me the * have always been a reality. So why should I assume that this is not the case in the U21?

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
00
228764.26 in reply to 228764.25
Date: 10/25/2012 3:15:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
And finally @B.B.King: I play the game since season 11 and I don't remember not seeing any "*" in the standings. You play the game longer than I do - but for me the * have always been a reality. So why should I assume that this is not the case in the U21?

You joined in S11 so You were able to notice Malta position in this table (I metioned it earlier):
http://www.buzzerbeater.com/world/standings.aspx?teamid=1...
It was reality in Consolation Tournament in S17. It was U21 competition, You were even U21 Manager at those moment.
I never was U21 Manager, however I think that it is always good idea for U21 (and NT as well) Manager to look at other competitions, there is always chance to see something interesting or to find and to learn something important.

And yes, I agree it's loophole, bad loophole. However this loophole is rule and general rule for me is "rules can't be changed during competitions".

This Post:
00
228764.27 in reply to 228764.26
Date: 10/25/2012 3:54:08 PM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83078307
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
And finally @B.B.King: I play the game since season 11 and I don't remember not seeing any "*" in the standings. You play the game longer than I do - but for me the * have always been a reality. So why should I assume that this is not the case in the U21?

You joined in S11 so You were able to notice Malta position in this table (I metioned it earlier):
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/world/standings.aspx?teamid=1...)
It was reality in Consolation Tournament in S17. It was U21 competition, You were even U21 Manager at those moment.
I never was U21 Manager, however I think that it is always good idea for U21 (and NT as well) Manager to look at other competitions, there is always chance to see something interesting or to find and to learn something important.

And yes, I agree it's loophole, bad loophole. However this loophole is rule and general rule for me is "rules can't be changed during competitions".


And there we disagree. I do not see why this is a rule as it is not stated anywhere in the rules other than the points I mentioned earlier. And if this game is based on rules that everyone should know about, them please discard the whole game manual. And make it even more "easy" for newcomers to understand the game and stick with it. Bravo. Good idea. (Sorry for the sarcastic last two sentences...)

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
00
228764.29 in reply to 228764.1
Date: 10/26/2012 6:34:53 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
I second this....The Walk Over screwed me as well....I finished right behind you in 34th place. I think England and Hong Kong should be punished because it was a TIE WO pact and that just sucks.


This Post:
11
228764.30 in reply to 228764.25
Date: 10/26/2012 7:07:35 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
I won't ban you. As I said, giving opinions is ok if done in a respectful manner. The issue is controversial so I've given users more leeway than usual.
But, I have to state again that a decision has been made and nothing said here will change that.

This Post:
00
228764.31 in reply to 228764.30
Date: 10/26/2012 10:06:35 AM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83078307
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
Thanks for replying and reading our posts, though. I think we should just let it be for the time being as changes are going be made for the next season if I understood you correctly.

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
11
228764.32 in reply to 228764.31
Date: 10/26/2012 10:15:37 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
This Post:
22
228764.33 in reply to 228764.32
Date: 1/1/2013 5:54:35 AM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72437243
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
(22145)

oh come on Marin. pls say that this is a joke...
is there still/again no "*" if a team forfeits?


and a hapy new year to you and the other BBs

This Post:
00
228764.34 in reply to 228764.32
Date: 1/1/2013 6:04:56 PM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
83078307
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
I don't really want to annoy you - you seem to be trying to as much as you can. But please fix the problem as you've promised last season. And it's not too late right now because no team has qualified and has to be taken out like last season.

If you've somehow fixed this thing with a different solution, please tell us what you've done ... but putting this "*" behind a team in the standings should be fairly easy to fix I think.

Also a happy new year to you - keep up your work!

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
Advertisement