BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > IBBF - Unofficial-Not-Elite Sanctioning Committee Organisation

IBBF - Unofficial-Not-Elite Sanctioning Committee Organisation

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
36864.24 in reply to 36864.21
Date: 6/24/2008 5:58:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
You got BB-Mail!

From: ZyZla

This Post:
00
36864.25 in reply to 36864.24
Date: 6/24/2008 6:29:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
what about Lithuania??? Where is the ranking list???

Last edited by ZyZla at 6/24/2008 6:38:35 PM

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
36864.26 in reply to 36864.25
Date: 6/24/2008 7:35:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
As you may have noticed, I'm on-board with this idea, and the original thread has been closed.

el macca has asked Acworth and I to maintain this, so I'll gladly do so.

Later tonight early tomorrow we'll finalize it all.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36864.27 in reply to 36864.23
Date: 6/24/2008 8:37:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
i'd definitely be up for being assistant commissioner.

This Post:
00
36864.28 in reply to 36864.25
Date: 6/24/2008 8:39:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
aside from the NT rankings which everyone can see there is the active user list which regular users would have to go through each country page. a very long process to say the least. but when i did that this morning Lithuania had 1,181 active users putting them at #4 behind Spain, Italy, and France.

This Post:
00
36864.29 in reply to 36864.28
Date: 6/24/2008 8:58:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
aside from the NT rankings which everyone can see there is the active user list which regular users would have to go through each country page. a very long process to say the least. but when i did that this morning Lithuania had 1,181 active users putting them at #4 behind Spain, Italy, and France.


I know someone who could possibly have a tool that can sort countries by number of users...

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36864.30 in reply to 36864.29
Date: 6/24/2008 11:39:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I think this is a really good idea, but it might create some headaches. Can middleweights only play middleweights? Or if the lightweight belt holder loses against a supercruiserweight, does he lose his belt?

After typing that, I guess the answers to my questions would be No and No. You only put the belt up for defense when you play a team in your weight class, and of course you can play anyone anytime. Some holders might dodge games against weight class opponents, but most probably won't.

Anyway, great idea El Macca and major kudos to GM-JuicePats for nobly getting on board.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
36864.32 in reply to 36864.31
Date: 6/25/2008 12:46:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Or maybe a belt can go no higher than its "true" level, but teams can play up and take belts higher than their level.

For instance, if a Welterweight nation (Canada) beat a Light-Heavyweight nation (China), Canada takes the Light-Heavyweight belt. The belt is then up for grabs any time Canada plays a nation Light-Heavyweight and below. So, if Canada played the USA in qualifying and lost, it would retain the Light-Heavyweight belt, but if it played Puerto Rico and lost, Puerto Rico would take the belt.

This allows tiny countries the thrill of taking the big belts without worrying about the risk that all the belts will end up in Italy's hands.


That's probably going to be the plan.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36864.33 in reply to 36864.32
Date: 6/25/2008 12:54:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
That sounds excellent.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
36864.34 in reply to 36864.33
Date: 6/25/2008 2:33:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
After a good night's rest I am glad this thread went in the right direction.

Good job folks.

I am still in favor of distributing the original belts randomly (I have a nice die at home which I used to judge a war game once and it is very neutral ;) )

OR

If we hand them out, I suggest we hand them out to the lowest ranked teams.
Why? easy, this way they, and some other teams can get a hold of it for a short period before it gets into the hands of the leaders of each division.

This ofcourse is only a proposition, and you guys do whatever you want to pick the initial holders.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
Advertisement