BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Why is "Blank lineup" allowed to work?

Why is "Blank lineup" allowed to work?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
204731.25 in reply to 204731.24
Date: 12/19/2011 9:39:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
So if I was to put in a lineup & select "Let Coach decided" I would get roughly the same rotation? I don't think I do, nor do I get the same type of Box Scores.

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
11
204731.26 in reply to 204731.17
Date: 12/19/2011 11:58:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
192192
Once enough people start "blanking" and talking about it on the Internet it will definitely catch on.

This Post:
22
204731.27 in reply to 204731.26
Date: 12/21/2011 12:19:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
People complain about the blank lineup, but you think Phil Jackson ever thought much about who to put on the floor?

This Post:
00
204731.28 in reply to 204731.27
Date: 12/21/2011 2:46:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
I guess, since he didn't like play rookies...

This Post:
00
204731.29 in reply to 204731.12
Date: 12/23/2011 5:15:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Would be interesting to see the results of each style against the same opposition.

This Post:
00
204731.30 in reply to 204731.29
Date: 12/23/2011 9:34:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
People that don't like blank lineups will be very interested to know that I played a blank lineup tonight in my PL game and the coach made horrible choices.

Chelsea Seagulls MIN FG 3FG FT +/- OR TR AST TO STL BLK PF PTS Rating
SG B. Melmeth 26 6 - 12 0 - 2 4 - 6 -15 1 4 2 1 3 0 1 16 10.5
PG J. Sherwin 27 6 - 7 0 - 0 3 - 4 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 15 6.0
PF O. Ðuričko 23 5 - 10 1 - 2 3 - 4 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 2 14 8.0
SF G. Larbi 24 2 - 8 0 - 0 2 - 2 +1 2 6 0 4 4 0 1 6 10.0
C D. Kumar 21 2 - 9 0 - 1 2 - 2 +5 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 6 5.0
SG M. Hongyun 25 2 - 12 1 - 8 0 - 0 +4 2 4 3 1 0 1 3 5 12.0
C K. Matakorama 24 2 - 5 0 - 0 0 - 0 -10 1 4 2 0 1 0 2 4 7.0
SF H. Broadfield 25 1 - 5 1 - 1 0 - 0 -14 2 3 3 3 1 0 3 3 5.0
PF D. Pandey 23 1 - 8 0 - 0 0 - 0 -16 1 4 1 4 0 0 2 2 4.5
PG R. Garrett 23 0 - 5 0 - 2 0 - 0 -15 2 4 0 0 1 0 2 0 6.0
Chelsea Seagulls 27 - 81 3 - 16 14 - 18 15 36 15 14 13 1 20 71


My C played PG, my PG played SG, my SG played PF, my PF played SF and a random $4.6k scrub was my C instead of a $60,000 real big man. The coach also gave at least 20 minutes to everyone even if they were a $3k player in mediocre GS instead of a $20-30,000 one in proficient GS. It was a total disaster!

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
204731.31 in reply to 204731.30
Date: 12/23/2011 3:44:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Private league minute management is broken/different than league game. You can already see strange things in WO-s. It's not simple 36+10(5)+2 as in league games.

This Post:
00
204731.32 in reply to 204731.30
Date: 12/23/2011 4:49:37 PM
Phoenix_Suns
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
176176
I tried a blank lineup in my PL game as well and it worked just perfectly right.

This Post:
00
204731.33 in reply to 204731.27
Date: 12/23/2011 6:06:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't......but did he ever play BuzzerBeater? Cause if not, that statement makes no sense.

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
00
204731.34 in reply to 204731.29
Date: 12/23/2011 6:06:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
It would answer a lot of questions.

Right is not a popularity contest!
From: ClipCap

This Post:
00
204731.35 in reply to 204731.30
Date: 12/23/2011 6:08:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
??? But I thought you had run this many times in NT games?
I have the same movement with my players, todays game had my C at PG at times, but it didn't affect the shots taken or missed for either team.

Right is not a popularity contest!
Advertisement