BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft- Group demonstration

Draft- Group demonstration

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
245560.25 in reply to 245560.24
Date: 7/18/2013 11:44:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6969
You realize that you include the salary of the player but you don't include the revenue that salary is used to generate right? Assuming the team is any good they should be getting comparable revenue from your arena, add in the tv contract and that should offset your team salary. If you are in negative income then you are doing something wrong. You don't depend on the draft to be your income, that's what your arena merchandise and tv contract are for. You depend on the draft to sustain your team, or if you already have trainees, use it as icing on the cake and make a couple extra bucks. If you are depending on the draft as your main source of income then you're definitely approaching BB with a unique view point

This Post:
00
245560.26 in reply to 245560.25
Date: 7/19/2013 11:20:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
I don't think the draft is likely to be a consistent profit source, so I agree with you there for sure. It's pretty hard to set yourself up to select the best player every season, if not impossible.

On the other hand, it appears some owners do pretty well on the transfer market turning a profit. Like this team (32001), which has earned about $1.5M a season on average in transfers. It's the exception, not the rule, I think. I've managed to make about an average of 100K a season on transfers, but at least I'm in the green.

And I've never sold a draftee for more than about 400K, max. Hard when you're in the top half of the league to get anyone good enough to sell for huge $$.

From: HAHA

This Post:
00
245560.28 in reply to 245560.15
Date: 7/19/2013 12:20:07 PM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
476476
Just wondering, if I spend 10 points on group demonstration, then interview the player. Would I know the height and age after interview the player? Or I must "scout/scouting combine" the player(s) to know their height and age, huh?

This Post:
00
245560.29 in reply to 245560.26
Date: 7/19/2013 5:04:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6969
As perpete said a big chunk of that came from selling his draftee (500k+). It really depends what your skills are. If you are in the top half of your league then I'd assume you would make a push to the next league up (the point of this game). Once you are there you will probably spend a season in the bottom half. A convenient time to find a good draftee?

This Post:
00
245560.30 in reply to 245560.25
Date: 7/19/2013 5:46:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I didn't include out side revenue period . just the salary and sale. when you go into that, it may look good on paper but its the furthest from reality of league salary, because increases in worth is unknown. Yes you can see when a player going to pop, but how much salary are behind those pops. None know that. All we can do is assume for the stronger skill it increase but how much in salary will it.?

I don't depend on the draft for any income period.This game is made to start on it. for a good team, this game promotes it.. I'm saying it flawed it good but its not perfect nor is it fair. if you need 2 new trainees a year for fan $$ then you losing money when you sale them even for a better player.

So their no point to do the draft in top league the talent is not there, its waste of revenue, because the player cant help create game winning revenue and if you sell them, then that money is not that much either, other than help keep things afloat for a season.. But thats if you get the player.. which not the case the majority of the time.

But to each their own.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 7/19/2013 6:00:47 PM

This Post:
00
245560.31 in reply to 245560.30
Date: 7/19/2013 5:59:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6969
Why would you not include outside revenue? What do you think the salaries of the player do are there for. You aren't paying your players so they can be sold. You are paying them to play game and win. By winning you get $$$$$ which is a result of you paying your players. So I see no reason to only include the money you get from the sale and not any money from games. Going by your logic training players are worthless because when you sell them, you sell them at a loss since their salary already ate up any profits you would have made. If you're going to see how profitable it is training players and only include a portion of the money they generate, then your analysis is basically useless.

This Post:
00
245560.32 in reply to 245560.31
Date: 7/19/2013 6:11:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
In top league this is true for some teams.. they sell at a lost because the salary's are very high. Its not my analysis per say.this game style of play is actually true.

Draft is worthless in top leagues. I don't see how you can argue that. All they can do is sell them to stay afloat( break even).

The best way to survive in the nbba or top is to arrive with a lot of cash and a very good young team or mid aged team that has the skills. Because salary's are so high you have sell you roster to get other players later on. If they have mass cash on hand then they can be more comfortable, not have to work so hard. But the manager still needs to be smart with his money cant go chasing the jones of BB.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 7/19/2013 6:29:50 PM

This Post:
00
245560.33 in reply to 245560.32
Date: 7/19/2013 6:26:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9393
Draft is not "worthless" in top leagues. As an example of how you can still draft well in top leagues, I refer you to Arizona Cacti (29518), who drafted an 18yo HOF with good skills with the 9th pick last season (28411387) and an 18yo SS this season with the 25th pick (29558979). I'll grant that this is certainly an exception, but clearly you're going too far to say that drafting in the top leagues is altogether worthless.

I'll also grant that most high-division teams do not spend much on scouting. But you completely misunderstand why this is the case. All of the managers in the league are good enough to appreciate the value of the draft and the players you can get through it, so the 2-3 managers with the worst records are investing heavily in the draft, and because they know how to scout properly (do scouting combine/scout 18yos etc.) then it's almost certain that they will find and draft the top 2-3 prospects in the draft. So if you know you're a contender in a top division who's likely to have a pick in the 12-16 range, you know that someone will pick the player you want before you. So to summarize, I find it really ironic that you insist the draft is worthless in the upper leagues, when the only reason why it might be "worthless" is because all of the managers value it so highly.

Last edited by Turtle at 7/19/2013 6:26:52 PM

This Post:
00
245560.34 in reply to 245560.33
Date: 7/19/2013 6:41:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Yes that team is lucky. But that is not the norm.

A lot don't have the finances to do the draft. The draft should be for rebuilding as of right now it is not worth it. Unless you can do what Arizona Cacti did for 3 season if not then it impossible to rebuild with the draft in top league, You wi;
have to demote.

Because the money is not there nor is the talent

Advertisement