BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > R-I-D-I-C-U-L-O-U-S

R-I-D-I-C-U-L-O-U-S

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
57037.25 in reply to 57037.20
Date: 11/9/2008 9:52:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Was my sentence really that difficult to understand? I suppose I should have written:

Furthermore, Pericle's team had fewer field goal attempts presumably because motion, the offensive tactic employed, is slower paced than run and gun which was the (winning) tactic employed by his opponent.

Anyway, it's sour grapes by a guy who lost a tough game because his OF was inept, his PG couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, and the other team shot better and more frequently and created more turnovers.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
57037.26 in reply to 57037.22
Date: 11/9/2008 6:18:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
maybe he must win without but or if........

everyone in italy think this.... also the opponent....

you can speek if...... but.....on my match (that i think something of...... is better taht i dont' speek) but this.....

there is no reason to lose it

and if you don't know this ts is into the valuations and they played with the same strengh so..... don't try to explein a ridiculus theory please

This Post:
00
57037.27 in reply to 57037.26
Date: 11/10/2008 4:52:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11011101
maybe he must win without but or if........

everyone in italy think this.... also the opponent....

you can speek if...... but.....on my match (that i think something of...... is better taht i dont' speek) but this.....

there is no reason to lose it

and if you don't know this ts is into the valuations and they played with the same strengh so..... don't try to explein a ridiculus theory please


What?

This Post:
00
57037.28 in reply to 57037.27
Date: 11/10/2008 7:18:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I guess he's trying to say there's a common view in the Italian community on this match.

Most people think that this should have been won by Pericle, just because he had 2 full levels above his opponent OD. At the same time the rating of his opponent attack against the appropriate defense was just about the same.

If the ratings rise thanks to the mots by a fixed percentage the opponent should be even in a worse situation.

If you take a look at the shoots, 3pt shots have been 36 for pericle's team, vs 31 for his opponent.

Still, his opponent shoot with 50% from the field, despite being 2 full levels behind in inside attack.

This Post:
00
57037.30 in reply to 57037.29
Date: 11/10/2008 8:34:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
He is overreacting that's for sure. But he turned ball over 8 times more than his opponent but rebounded 6 balls more than his opponent. I don't see how he had 10 shots less (I understand it is not always exact and that he shut more FTs but still). Although he played slower tactic it still should be attack-defense-attack-defense influenced by Tos, Rebs, (jump balls - didn't see any so far) and end of quarters. I didn't notice any team rebounding.

It looks like everything should be in ranings (both team and matchup) including home court advantage, enthusiasm, tactics. So it don't really see how the winner is (clearly) better. I think th random effect took its toll - which is not really a bad thing, there is a need to have some.

Maybe shot clock violations are not counte in the sum of the teams turnovers?!

This Post:
00
57037.32 in reply to 57037.29
Date: 11/10/2008 9:09:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Still, his opponent shoot with 50% from the field, despite being 2 full levels behind in inside attack.

Well, apparently this game just taught us that it might be a pretty bad idea to play a slow-down tactic with crappy offensive flow.


I'm sorry, but that really hasn't anything to do with opponent shots percentage.

I really cannot see how can someone shoot with 50% when 2 levels behind before adding in the mots bonus.

If mots gives just a 10% bonus, that's almost one full level added.

Can you link some teams with good offensive flow playing slow tactics?

This Post:
00
57037.33 in reply to 57037.31
Date: 11/10/2008 9:50:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I mean either team or matchup of course. I meant nothing is left outside of them except FTs adn stamina i guess.

This Post:
00
57037.34 in reply to 57037.31
Date: 11/10/2008 9:57:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
the two teams are really close as players skill,rather maybe Pericle's players are better(see the championship ranking).He also plays very good tactics,contrarily of his adversary.So,apart the absurd random,there are not good explanations for his loss(and he played also in his arena field!)

This Post:
00
57037.35 in reply to 57037.34
Date: 11/10/2008 10:41:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
the two teams are really close as players skill,rather maybe Pericle's players are better(see the championship ranking).He also plays very good tactics,contrarily of his adversary.So,apart the absurd random,there are not good explanations for his loss(and he played also in his arena field!)


I can't even begin to elucidate the number of falsehoods in this post.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Advertisement