BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft List Questions~

Draft List Questions~

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
146657.250 in reply to 146657.249
Date: 6/16/2010 12:19:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
168168
I see. But apart from that my understanding was correct? Cause I intend to jus aim for playoffs this season while upgrading the arena. My division's quite dead / non-competitive... so I think I can get away with putting 'Player A' with enough minutes for full training as a sub + scrimmaging :)


This Post:
00
146657.251 in reply to 146657.249
Date: 6/16/2010 12:25:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Just play him in the scrimmages

This Post:
00
146657.253 in reply to 146657.252
Date: 6/16/2010 1:20:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
168168
thanks everyone for clearing all that up...

ugh.. now i regret TL'ing the superstar i picked up : (

From: oriolekid

This Post:
00
146657.254 in reply to 146657.237
Date: 6/16/2010 3:25:02 PM
LionPride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
So how much starting salary would an A+ star rating be?

I'm hoping at least 5k

From: Herald
This Post:
00
146657.255 in reply to 146657.254
Date: 6/16/2010 4:01:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Can anyone help me to set my draft order? It's my first draft, so I want to get some clue about it. Info about players is like this:

P1 - 5 / A / 2 / 18
P2 - 4 / B- / 3 / 18
P3 - 5 / A / 4 / 19
P4 - 3 / C+ / 4 / 19
P5 - 4 / B+ / 2 / 19
P6 - 2 / D- / 2 / 18
P7 - 4 / B+ / 1 / 19

I have P1 to P3 on first three places, then a few 5 stars players (with no potential info) and then P4. There follow other players with stars or completely blank and on the very three last positions are P5 to P7. Would you do it otherwise? Thanks a lot for anything!

From: GWgw

This Post:
00
146657.257 in reply to 146657.256
Date: 6/16/2010 5:25:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
No way is A+ over 6k, it's possible but still highly unlikely. There are probably only a fraction of a percent of all new players that have a starting salary that high. I had an A+ player last draft if I remember correctly and he was starting salary of ~$4200 with Hall of famer potential but he was 19 yr old. Since I am not a single position trainer I sold him near the end of this season since I wouldn't come close to fulfilling his potential.

This Post:
00
146657.258 in reply to 146657.255
Date: 6/16/2010 5:27:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
In my opinion, if you have 5 / A / * / 18, its better then "P1 - 5 / A / 2 / 18", because the chances that he's 1 ball is very little, so you may even earn 5 balls, 2 balls potential just ain't worth picking.

From: GWgw
This Post:
00
146657.259 in reply to 146657.255
Date: 6/16/2010 5:31:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
I don't place much in the boxscores but I do remember reading something from last draft where some of the more experienced players were saying the boxscores can be useful in determining something based on the personal fouls a player has. This I guess has to do with the rumoured (confirmed?) hidden "aggressiveness" stat. What I want to know is, are more fouls (i.e. an aggressive player) a good or bad thing? I have a scouted couple of players who had 4-5 fouls in only 20-26 minutes of playing time. Are these players over-aggressive and I should stay away since they will limit themselves in playing time due to foul trouble?

From: chris902

To: GWgw
This Post:
00
146657.260 in reply to 146657.259
Date: 6/16/2010 5:47:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
My understanding of the confirmed aggressiveness/physicality trait is that a player with high physicality is more likely to foul but he's also more likely to get fouled. So if you had an inside player with high IS or a guard with high driving/handling who was very physical it could end up being a net gain for you, but you probably don't want a defensive specialist centre with high physicality. (and you probably don't want too many players who are on either extreme)

Last edited by chris902 at 6/16/2010 5:48:02 PM

Advertisement