GREAT 8Prov City Investors - Chicago Bulls (92-93, but not as good)I like to emphasize the word not as good cause Prov City really had to have 2 losts at most to be considered as good. But given the rarity of a player like Carmona coming around, I had to draw to team that had rare SG so Carmona is the MJ somewhat of our league. I had to draw to a team also who good SF to compare to while Faerber isn't Pippen he's the best supporting role player for the Investors. B.J. Armstrong was young and good ball manager like Zullo and Horace Grant could grab the paint and score little inside like Bridejs. If you subtract Kobe from Lakers since his career started, you couldn't see Lakers being as backcourt as Investors, and while Heat's DWade were close to the label, they just didn't exactly have the right SF or PG to compare to Investors, so 92-93 Bulls is closest comparison. I'd say Carmona is more Wade or Kobe than MJ however
Crank Dat Soulja Boy - Miami Heat (Wade/Shaq Era, but not as good)I won't be bias with my team and will say hey we the best hands down. But with my team having the SG & C outshine the rest, it's either Kobe/Shaq or Wade/Shaq to compare to and my team not as winning as Kobe/Shaq so I chose Miami. Laportilla is good serviceable player like Antoine Walker that can shoot the 3. My PG & SF situation a bit different from Miami back then as mine young & theirs old but from limited pool of team to choose that have the awesome SG/C such errors would happen.
Royal Challengers - Chicago BullsAs mentioned good PF & C combo in the NBA harder to find than in BB so while not the perfect comparison, good enough considering i set priority to compare modern day team and Royal's best players come from the PG, PF, & C. As you guessed, Marangon, Skalec, & Matveevskiy are Rose, Boozer, & Noah respectively. While Rose scores more, the rest is similar between him and Marangon, and both are young with more to grow. Skalec & Matveevskiy rebound more but that's how BB works, by percentile they like Boozer & Noah stand atop in rebounds while Boozer will score much more. Overstreet shows resemblence to Deng as well.
Michigan Blasters - Atlanta HawksNot that comparible but when you look into it, they look more like the Hawks than initially it may seem. The rest can score with the Hawks but Joe Johnson scores a bit more much like Ichaso. Pistono can score little in the paint and rebound like Horford, Bordelle can block & steal like Josh Smith but rebounds more compare to his and doesn't score as much. The rest of the starters are solid and whoever starts between Steven Jones or Kris Shultz we can say they got someone coming from the bench and cause havoc like Jamal Crawford. I wouldn't say this is like hawks team in direct one on one comparison but on the big picture consider they are pretty solid from PG to C and got solid depth.
Ron Swansons All-Stars - Toronto RaptorsMaybe I'm missing a team that's better compared and I feel tired so I'm not thinking of one at best on top of my head. Reason I say RSAS are like Raptors is their best player is a center, but Bargnani more of a scorer and less rebounder than Lemos. The rest are more about the guards who like the Raptors, RSAS also have young backcourt with some future.
No Potential - Golden State Warriors2nd time I made a GSW comparison. That's because this is a team composed of formiddable guards in Beckman & Gallano drawing similarities in playing style like Ellis & Curry. GSW is unique in its style so only them are composed of good guards that bring more shooting than passing. Csikos also has similar numbers with Dorrell Wright & while NP doesn't have directly a big man you can directly compare with GSW, in the big picture both got someone that can grab rebounds David Lee is more scorer than any of NP's big men
For Continued Article go to
(168948.267)Last edited by Coach_Gil at 3/12/2011 1:14:08 AM