BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Best PF in BB?

Best PF in BB?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
177508.26 in reply to 177508.24
Date: 3/16/2011 7:26:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
yes that's my trainee, he's height is good for SF and also good for "little" PF,, I think he is too short for playing C in I division, and also if he makes it to the NT team then he is too short there to..

L James
This Post:
11
177508.27 in reply to 177508.26
Date: 3/16/2011 8:18:05 PM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
Just checking that u realise height doesn't matter during a game. A 208cm C should play just as well as a 193cm C if they have the same skills. So a player may lack the skills to play C in Div 1 or the NT but he can't be 'too short'.

This Post:
00
177508.28 in reply to 177508.25
Date: 3/17/2011 6:08:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I just want to note again that lets say the deference between 17-18 is much less than lets say from 13-14.


depends on the competion also, because the engine counts with absolute differences and not like in the past days with relativ ones.

This Post:
00
177508.29 in reply to 177508.28
Date: 3/17/2011 6:29:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
Its simple man. Go on Parrot, and left only one player, and then play with his skills compared to the ratings. You will find out that for example more than 17 JS to the guards boost the ratings very little.

This Post:
00
177508.30 in reply to 177508.29
Date: 3/17/2011 8:28:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i don't look that much on the ratings since the new GE, maybe thats the reason ;) But the BB stated that they changed the calculation from relativ to absolute difference because of this problematic with the higher skills, and i am not sure if they changed the calculation after the ge changes i believe that there was some complains after that because of this but i am not so sure.