BuzzerBeater Forums

Non-BB Global (English) > Shaq: I'm done

Shaq: I'm done

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
186343.26 in reply to 186343.25
Date: 6/8/2011 12:47:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
If you say so

This Post:
11
186343.27 in reply to 186343.26
Date: 6/8/2011 12:49:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
If you say so

Ouch. Not exactly furthering the discussion, didn't mean to upset/annoy you. You disagree with my premise of a time-frame?

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.28 in reply to 186343.27
Date: 6/8/2011 2:36:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
As I said before, I am not just talking about the Shaqs, Howards, Wilts, and Kareems. The center position isnt what it used to be, with the zone defenses particularly useful against inside players. This negatively impacts center stats from star to scrub. It is my belief and my point that even such inside dominant players like Howard would put up better stats in the absence of zones. If we compare stats from Wilt or Kareem or even Shaq to the inside dominant players of today or the future, no matter how rare they are, the old timers will have the benefit of 'no-zone' stats.

This Post:
00
186343.29 in reply to 186343.28
Date: 6/8/2011 5:28:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Aaaaah.
But the "old timers" also don't have the advantage of the 3pt line that current centers do. There's no where near as much collapsing in on the basket as there was in times gone by. Also, the game clock. It ensures that shots HAVE to be made, and the game just doesn't devolve into a game of "keepings-off".
Both these things favor the modern center, and significantly so.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.30 in reply to 186343.29
Date: 6/9/2011 3:33:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
What does zone have anything to do with it. In his first ten years Shaq would have dominated any type of inside defense Or did you see another 7 foot 1, 325 lbs. monster not be able to dominate the paint?:D

My point is, zone defense doesn't have anything to do with it. There still are some powerful centers out there. The single difference is that modern centers have developed a jump shot. And there aren't that many teams that play successful zone either... (IMO)

This Post:
00
186343.31 in reply to 186343.30
Date: 6/9/2011 3:53:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
This is hilarious stuff.

This Post:
00
186343.32 in reply to 186343.30
Date: 6/11/2011 7:05:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
What does zone have anything to do with it. In his first ten years Shaq would have dominated any type of inside defense Or did you see another 7 foot 1, 325 lbs. monster not be able to dominate the paint?:D

My point is, zone defense doesn't have anything to do with it. There still are some powerful centers out there. The single difference is that modern centers have developed a jump shot. And there aren't that many teams that play successful zone either... (IMO)

Not the point being discussed. Yes, Shaq would have dominated any defense. So would have Kareem, Wilt, Russell.
My point is that I think - as you suggest - that the position's evolved somewhat. And that to look back over a 50 year span, pull out half a dozen great centers then bemoan the lack of them today is a little incorrect.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
186343.33 in reply to 186343.32
Date: 6/12/2011 1:25:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Honestly, I'm not really sure its the zone defense that is hampering "great" centers. I really think its the abundance of other 7-footers/big men to play them defensively. I think if you go back and look at Mikan and Wilt and even more recent centers, they have distinct height and length advantages over their competition. With Shaq, it wasn't so much his height as his mass and strength.

This Post:
00
186343.34 in reply to 186343.32
Date: 6/14/2011 1:05:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Have you ever actually played organized basketball? With refs and coaches and everything? You speak about basketball from a paper pushing analyst point of view. Talking about defense while looking at box scores doesnt mean a whole lot. Please tell me the origin of your expertise.

This Post:
00
186343.35 in reply to 186343.34
Date: 6/14/2011 7:13:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Oh yes! Well... most of the time! Hey, one time? We even got to play in a stadium, instead of outdoors on the grass! And they had lights!!! They looked good even tho' we weren't allowed to turn them on!
...
...
...


Just because my opinion differs from yours, doesn't mean that you can attempt to deride and demean. Yes, I've played "organised basketball". Both in Australia and in Japan. Currently not, as my life situation won't allow it (should I regret having both a job and a family?).
I hope you're not asserting that your own personal experience as a "player in organized basketball" makes you the preeminent authority in discussing elite centers in the history of the NBA. That'd be an interesting stance to take.

Honestly, I'm not really sure its the zone defense that is hampering "great" centers. I really think its the abundance of other 7-footers/big men to play them defensively. I think if you go back and look at Mikan and Wilt and even more recent centers, they have distinct height and length advantages over their competition. With Shaq, it wasn't so much his height as his mass and strength.

This is a very good point - and it's not like zone D is played to a great degree. Your last sentence is spot on with Shaq - I don't think there's ever been a guy like him with those advantages to that extent.

Last edited by malice at 6/14/2011 8:05:24 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
11
186343.36 in reply to 186343.35
Date: 6/14/2011 8:34:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Funny, for someone who has played organized ball you sure know little about zone defense.

You also posted that you had predictions on your website, and when someone asked why you hadnt included Chicago you gave no opinion, just stated "someone else wrote those". I would be most happy to send you links showing the decline in stat averagers among centers since zone was introduced and made legal in the NBA. You dont argue or discuss with anyone, you state your opinion and trash other based on nothing, just your gut hunches I guess. Did you eeven look into wheather center stats have declined? Im guessing no. You just thought I was wrong and decided pronouncing it was proof enough.

I am no expert on basketball, but one thing I am sure of is you dont know crud, dude.

Advertisement