lol you can just spell out names, no need to say "as another candidate did"
one would assume i get points for trying to bring out a debate and point out areas of improvement other than just "oh, i dont think greerzilla did a good job"
in all honesty, there was nothing wrong with greerzilla's game besides completely botching the first game and couldve done more on the involvement side
but all i hear are "we're not happy", "dont think he did a good job", etc etc...
who took the time to actually make counter suggestions and ways for him and/or other managers to improve?
no i didnt want to win, but at least i couldve kept the program alive and well enough until the next election
ocho cinco? really? 15 votes?
managers that didnt vote, fine
dont try to make excuses for why ocho cinco won 15 votes because frankly that is unacceptable with regards to the % of votes that he got
i wasn't pointing fingers, it was more rhetorical questions for all to consider
like i said in a previous post, moving on, we need to make sure of the following in the next elections
(if others accept, let's put it as a canadian tradition)
1) remind voters in one of the threads of when the deadline is
2) formulate and pump out standard questions so we dont have people complaining about lack of information to justify voting
3) dont default games so there are no more voting controversies lol