BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Worst 164TSP Ever?

Worst 164TSP Ever?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
311648.26 in reply to 311648.25
Date: 9/29/2021 1:08:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
There is not such a thing as "too low".

Let's say that you are the NT in France (or other country, it doesn't matter) and a BB makes you an offer.
You can use for the next game a player that is OD=1 and level 25 in all other skills. And, if you accept, he will play as PG both offense and defense. (the other team don't know anything)

Would you accept the offer?
I would.
And you say "But he is a OD=1. He can't defend as a PG"
I know, but I would take the offer. And I would win the game.

This Post:
00
311648.28 in reply to 311648.26
Date: 9/29/2021 3:26:18 PM
Joruus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
656656
This 1 OD player would probably be fouled out before the end of the 1st quarter. :D

This Post:
11
311648.33 in reply to 311648.32
Date: 9/30/2021 7:14:29 AM
Kira Kira Koseki
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
779779
Second Team:
Yubi Yubi
Note that I never said Boissard was 'good' for his TSP level because he isn't. I just wanted to point out that he has things going for him, especially the 17 JR which is rare to see on guards much less SF's (14 ID clearly isn't enough but it's still his best position overall). With the change to outside shooting back in season 52, that level of JR can pierce through even the best defenders.

You might argue that I'm wrong on this, but consider that his PPG in last season's B3 was 28.2, with a 3PT% of 37.1. His league numbers are also impressive; 27.7 PPG both this season and last in Ukraine Superleague. And when he has gotten an extended run for France this season he's typically gone off for a lot of points. The numbers don't lie, and they say that playing against Boissard is all about outscoring him, not guarding him.

This Post:
11
311648.35 in reply to 311648.34
Date: 9/30/2021 10:20:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
305305
First of all only my french friends think that my goal is maximum tsp. It’s absolute false.
your french friends are dumb. Ha/Dr=20 is not high by any means.


So you are training him for PF/C in Patient for your club.
I would say 3 things...
(1) Patient is neutral offense. He will take many inside shots. And he doesn't really need so much JR against inside defenders
(2) he could take one or two more levels in one on one, not only for elastics, also to make sure he is the one that takes the shots.
1 and 2 are debatable, but 3 ...
(3) why on hell do you want to pay extra PG salary with those PA=14 if you want him to take the shots himself? You could have saved a lot of money with less passing, money that you can spend in other players.

So more one on one forwards and pressure and less passing and JR would have been the way to go. Any top manager will tell you this.

In fact, I think he is a better player for France NT than for a club.

This Post:
00
311648.36 in reply to 311648.34
Date: 9/30/2021 12:28:21 PM
Jambon Mogettes
Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14071407
Hi, men.
Interesting discussion.
First of all only my french friends think that my goal is maximum tsp. It’s absolute false.
Yes I’m training him focused on my personal understanding and for my team, not blessed on what France wants.

Secondary I need his rebounding level since I want to play him as Pf or C and not destroy team rates of Re (as well as ID).

This player is just my idea of patient.
He has bad efficiency since I had bad team now.

You can tell that on a paper you can creat 100 more effective profiles in 164 tsp but you can’t receive this in real game because you capped the player much more earlier.

I don’t understand hate of some of you.
Just create better your own player and show to everyone.
My team is not a farm. I’m training him the whole road with trainer 5lvl and have won 3 Champions in Ukraine since of this star.
I’ve never trained GS and trained according his plan even in finals.
Can you do such things?

Peace to all.

P.S.: next season will be +1Jr and I will try to create +1Is.


We can recognize that: that's what you say for a long time. But i won't change my opinion, i also think he is not dominant in NT (as were the players of goldsons...)

Advertisement