BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Strategy for the match

Strategy for the match

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Shoei

This Post:
00
41887.26 in reply to 41887.25
Date: 9/15/2008 10:45:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
the beauty of bb compare to other online basketball manager games for me is not just in the real time you get to watch it live with a court and you see shot sttempted and how it goes.

but the simplicity of how to navigate things around compare to other sites.

i did try to play other but i get so bothered and bored because it takes me so much time just to get a game set, my players training module and ect.

you cant just set thngs automatically or with a lot of if and donts,

i think this person just needed to be taught how to check and scout other teams,
its not easy but the challenge and excitement of this, you get to see clearly if your strategy or gamble pays off.


This Post:
00
41887.27 in reply to 41887.26
Date: 9/15/2008 11:54:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
the beauty of bb compare to other online basketball manager games for me is not just in the real time you get to watch it live with a court and you see shot sttempted and how it goes.

but the simplicity of how to navigate things around compare to other sites.

i did try to play other but i get so bothered and bored because it takes me so much time just to get a game set, my players training module and ect.

you cant just set thngs automatically or with a lot of if and donts,

i think this person just needed to be taught how to check and scout other teams,
its not easy but the challenge and excitement of this, you get to see clearly if your strategy or gamble pays off.



I completely agree with this.

This isn't meant to be rocket science.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
41887.28 in reply to 41887.22
Date: 9/16/2008 11:56:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
What the game needs is a big amount of conditions and consecuences. For example.
"If player x of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"

Team A sets:
"If player X of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Y"
"If the other team is playing inside, I defend 2-3"
"If player Z of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player U"
"If the other team is playing outside, I defende 3-2"

Team B sets:
"If player Y of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player Z"
"If the other team is defending 2-3, I play outside"
"If player U of the opponent team is on the floor, I play player X
"If the other team is defending 3-2, I play inside"

...

I could maybe agree with the part about the duel between the players,i certainly don't agree with your suggestion about tattica.In your idea,you cannot use it to beat other teams because it's too easy to prepare a tattic against enemy offense and so on

This Post:
00
41887.29 in reply to 41887.28
Date: 9/16/2008 2:48:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
106106
I could maybe agree with the part about the duel between the players,i certainly don't agree with your suggestion about tattica.In your idea,you cannot use it to beat other teams because it's too easy to prepare a tattic against enemy offense and so on

It isn't my idea and I wouldn't like that either.

That was actually to illustrate a case where those if-conditions would "go in circles".

This Post:
00
41887.30 in reply to 41887.1
Date: 9/16/2008 8:57:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not always able to watch my BB games, so I don't really like this idea...

Say you're running an inside offense, and the other team is running a defense that isn't so spectacular against inside plays...if you're not home, then you'll have to stay on inside offense, while the other team can switch to a 2-3 and stop you alot better...

Just doesn't seem fair to me.

This Post:
00
41887.31 in reply to 41887.30
Date: 9/16/2008 10:23:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I dunno about you guys, but I'm not always able to watch my BB games, so I don't really like this idea...

Say you're running an inside offense, and the other team is running a defense that isn't so spectacular against inside plays...if you're not home, then you'll have to stay on inside offense, while the other team can switch to a 2-3 and stop you alot better...

Just doesn't seem fair to me.

And who says that you should be running inside offense all the time?

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
41887.32 in reply to 41887.31
Date: 9/19/2008 8:51:07 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
And who says that you should be running inside offense all the time?


i think he's talking about the idea of adjusting the strategy in-game

This Post:
00
41887.33 in reply to 41887.32
Date: 9/19/2008 10:36:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
And who says that you should be running inside offense all the time?


i think he's talking about the idea of adjusting the strategy in-game

I don't quite understand what he has in mind, actually. But the coach already does adjust tactics in-game slightly, to exploit the weaknesses of the opposition.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
41887.34 in reply to 41887.33
Date: 9/19/2008 2:28:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
But I'd like an option to set coaches attitude to timeouts. There have been times, I've been begging, crying, screaming, throwing mouse to walls for a timeout, while watching my team lose a decent lead or being dipped, donked and dropped on until down by near 20 points down.

His attitude to timeouts could be as aggressive, normal and conservative.

Aggressive=Team doesn't score on 4 consecutive possessions and its a timeout, or enemy scores on 4 consecutive possession and its timeout.

Normal=Same as now. (maybe timeouts in final 2 minutes while leading by 3 or less to protect the lead)

Conservative=During first 46 minutes coach takes a timeout, if you get down by 20 points. The rest but 1 is saved for last 2 minutes to give you an edge AND they are used even if you lead by 6 points, last timeout is saved for last possession.

This Post:
00
41887.35 in reply to 41887.34
Date: 9/19/2008 3:13:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
with the aggressive way, lot of coaches willl waste their timeout in first quarter, i like to see the normal time out rules, that the coaches don't spare all 6 timeout for the last quarter and sometimes take 5 of it in the last minute(wich is pretty boring ;)).

As a result of that rule it should be impleted that coaches takes time out with a higher probability short time before the to get lost.

From: Shoei

This Post:
00
41887.36 in reply to 41887.35
Date: 9/19/2008 8:42:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
i think we all know that we have our dis-satisfaction towards the time out how its being address in the games.

truth is how i wish we have a timeout botton we can press whenever we feel things get out of hand and waits for the next possible deadball to cal it

but i doubt that can happen.


Advertisement