BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Game shape = random?

Game shape = random?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
68860.26 in reply to 68860.25
Date: 1/19/2009 11:21:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


No, I never said that.

The last GS change was announced, and was several seasons back, when the extremity of GS drops for overplaying was toned down.

It hasn't changed since.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.27 in reply to 68860.26
Date: 1/19/2009 11:34:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Ok.. but most of the people saw changes in this system recently and more "random" in the results, which doesn't appeared before.

So if so much people (and more than who responded here) say that they feel a change, so might be something there.. no ?

Last edited by Warrior at 1/19/2009 11:34:31 AM

This Post:
00
68860.28 in reply to 68860.27
Date: 1/19/2009 11:36:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I don't know how much more clear I can make this.

There has been no change, period.

You repeating it isn't going to trigger a change, either, so there's really no point in continuing to press me for info on something that doesn't exist.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.29 in reply to 68860.26
Date: 1/19/2009 12:39:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


No, I never said that.

Some might. :)

This Post:
00
68860.30 in reply to 68860.25
Date: 1/19/2009 1:00:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Without a doubt there was no change.

so all the people here just idiots ?
interesting point.. I didn't thought about it .


What are you talking about? Do you believe your own words?

If there is a small random factor in the calculation of Game Shape, then it might surely be that one got no problems 5 seasons in a row. In the 6th season it may be the 1st time that a player's gameshape is negativly influence by the randomness, instead of positivly. Then one reports it as a bug, fine no problems, since it's clarified now.

Your posts are useless this way if you keep on saying no while there has been confirmed yes several times. Why do you even post here if you don't even accept anything else but your own view?

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 1/19/2009 1:01:34 PM

This Post:
00
68860.31 in reply to 68860.30
Date: 1/19/2009 1:34:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
i think there is a point in what you say the random factor should be in positive and negative

but....

If there is a small random factor in the calculation of Game Shape, then it might surely be that one got no problems 5 seasons in a row. In the 6th season it may be the 1st time that a player's gameshape is negativly influence by the randomness, instead of positivly. Then one reports it as a bug, fine no problems, since it's clarified now.


i think he is not the only one that think this way he might have say it not so political correct but if there was a change (and the BB's say no) we shod have bean announced abut it even if it was correcting something that had a problem for 5 seasons till now and i am talking abut the random factor going both positive and negative



Your posts are useless this way if you keep on saying no while there has been confirmed yes several times. Why do you even post here if you don't even accept anything else but your own view?


here i just think it was pointless you make a availed point and then just insult a guy and just say he dont need to post what he thinks that just rude if you ask me

Get your facts firs then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
This Post:
00
68860.32 in reply to 68860.30
Date: 1/19/2009 1:43:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
There is reason that you attack only me, at a time that I say what everybody said before ?
You know there is a little thing called freedom of speech and I don't remember I broke any law in any one of my posts..

This Post:
00
68860.33 in reply to 68860.31
Date: 1/19/2009 1:43:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
i think he is not the only one that think this way he might have say it not so political correct but if there was a change (and the BB's say no) we shod have bean announced abut it even if it was correcting something that had a problem for 5 seasons till now and i am talking abut the random factor going both positive and negative


Well, there has not been a change, hence no announcement.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.34 in reply to 68860.32
Date: 1/19/2009 2:48:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
@Nirman; there was no change, so there was no announcement.

There is reason that you attack only me, at a time that I say what everybody said before ?


Well that's kind of the point. Many posts I read coming from you are negative, and you keep on projecting your own opinion as the opinion of everyone. I'm getting tired of that.

Please don't get political here, it's useless to trow in 'the freedom of speech' here. There is just no point in saying 'yes' after there has been confirmed 'no' several times.

As you may have seen when you did read this thread, was that many people reported no changes as well. But you only seem to read the posts that fit your own opinion, that's why I made that post before.

There's nothing wrong in posting, dont get me wrong, and maybe my last post sounded a little though. But imo your posts are rather spamming than adding something valueable to the discussion. What exactly did you want to achieve with those posts? Another dozens of confirmations?

Note: I'm speaking as PatjeBono now, so ignore the GM there.


Last edited by BB-Patrick at 1/19/2009 2:53:49 PM

This Post:
00
68860.35 in reply to 68860.32
Date: 1/19/2009 3:08:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
There is reason that you attack only me, at a time that I say what everybody said before ?
You know there is a little thing called freedom of speech and I don't remember I broke any law in any one of my posts..


Apropos of probably nothing, but "freedom of speech" does not apply to a private entity, such as BuzzerBeater.

Here's the actual text from the 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

That said, other than the stated conference rules, freedom of speech is very much encouraged here.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
68860.36 in reply to 68860.35
Date: 1/19/2009 5:07:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I didn't passed any law of buzzerbeater by way of limitation of the rules and I'm completely standing in the minimal requirements of the "freedom of speech" at the same time preserving of buzzerbeater rules.

And PatjeBono, I write here in the global at very low frequency so I don't really know about what you talking about when you say "negative posts"..
And if there wasn't change in that system and you (the whole staff) so certain of this, why to keep this thread active, for more debates like this one?

Anyway, when I advertised the first message here I didn't meant to start to argue about it.. just to say my opinion and sorry that it was so "decisive" but that I see the things and although you guys say that there wasn't any change, I read the general opinion here, in Israel, in the NT and anywhere and I feel that there was something.. maybe the effect of the specialist doctor(which have to help..), I really don't know what cause this "feeling of change" but I feeling it, like the others. so I'll stick in my opinion.

Thanks.

Advertisement