BuzzerBeater Forums

I never imagined that trying to discuss respectfully about one point of the game would not be considered as productive, and whether after searching and reading topics about rankings, trying to obtain more details about a suggestion thread where I agree with previous posts would not be seen as on track with the conversation :/
There is no irony here. I've always tried to be positive in my posts, and I'm a bit sad with your reply.

My comment about staying on track was specifically directed at you asking for the BB's to comment. If they deem it necessary to comment they will jump in. In the past when they have stepped in it has drastically changed the flow of the conversation and disrupted the productivity of seeing what BB members are actually thinking. They try to be very careful about what they say and what they promise.

as we have no clue on the way it works now :

We have no clue about how a lot of the game works thats what makes BB so much fun. If we understood everything everyone would have great teams.

We have no clue about how a lot of the game works thats what makes BB so much fun. If we understood everything everyone would have great teams.

Efforts and patience often make the difference. Not only knowledge.
What is enhanced by the fact of adaptating oneself and anticipating for the frequent changes done by the staff.
This is the reason why even great teams can stop.

We are not talking about knowing everything but to know if at least some parts of suggestions done by the manager are already used or not. What it would make much less frustrating the animation of the suggestion forum, and would help managers to be more interested about participating to it.

That's all for it. I just wanted to precise this part.

Anyway rankings are not a top secret necessity to the game. It is just an indicator that might be clearly improved.
Of course, it is not a priority to the BBs.
Well that's more a reason than anything to let managers think about it, with some replies from time to time to what they propose.



Last edited by Dunker Joe at 7/7/2010 6:06:52 PM

Thanks for your answer Charles
I'm sure that it will help managers here having interesting suggestions.

Well, put in that way, I agree in most of the parts with you.

Just one point, where I wish there will be other points of view :
As you said it here

Are tournament games weighted more heavily? Yes, tournament games are more important than league games. Yes again, because this is evidenced by teams later in the tournament who have three games to navigate during a given week typically putting the most effort and the best lineup into their cup game.

It is mainly true later in the cup.
To come back to the example I gave formerly, last season, the 64th french fell back to 104th whereas he lost in the first turn against a weaker team that played with full strenght.

Anyway, now, I tend to think that effectively, if the gap between teams (based on the rankings :p) is taken into account, then the importance of the turn should also be considered for the calculation.

I mean, that gap between teams should perhaps be considered as less important later in the game than in the beginning.
I mean, that IRL a weaker team doing a great walkthrough will be considered as much more dangerous than in the beginnning.
And whether, in the same time, his ranking would increase more and more as it is going further in the cup

By this way, it would also reduce the gap between teams going further in cup, what would help diminishing the importance of the cup. Less comparison possible between teams that are not in the same division or tournaments yes, this is a problem. But right now, by taking this lack of information into account isn't it uncertainty too much at the advantage of winning teams with 1 victory whereas the loser won't have another chance as he si eliminated ?
I have no opinion about this point for the moment, personnally.
The question of the refreshment of rankings is effectively central. I hadn't thought about it so preciseley before.


To give one example, this team was in french D4 last season and went up until turn 9 of the cup : (35312)
Well, almost everyone on the external forum of french managers knew this team and considered it as dangerous ! , whatever was their level.


About the stats you gave, it effectively proves that the ranking system is not bad in term of prevision.
The most well ranked team wins more often (hopefully ^^ ), yet it doesn't mean that it can't be ameliorated by modifying a bit the importance of the cup or by precising other coeffs.

Last edited by Dunker Joe at 7/9/2010 2:39:30 PM

So according to yodabig his rating is really good.Take mine for example
11 1.1 teams better than me
1 2.1 team better than me
1 2.2 team beter than me
So my ranking should be around 13 but my ranking is 17,though it might not seem a big difference but it is considering that india har only 55 active teams.And moreover my world rank should be around 17000 but the world ranking has some different say.Currently my world rank is about 27500 which is really low for a team like mine.