BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Buzzerbeaters Best ( Season 19 )

Buzzerbeaters Best ( Season 19 )

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
210195.27 in reply to 210195.26
Date: 3/6/2012 5:39:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
The Motion team committed too many fouls...I guess his inside defense isn't good enough. It happens when opposing C has high JS (not that I know if Matsu Soloman's C has high JS...).

This Post:
00
210195.28 in reply to 210195.26
Date: 3/6/2012 7:27:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
887887
Yeah, I see. There is some bad luck + less shots taken.

This Post:
00
210195.29 in reply to 210195.27
Date: 3/6/2012 8:31:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Good defenders make more fouls then bad ones, i believe even the Bb said it 2-3 month ago.

This Post:
11
210195.30 in reply to 210195.29
Date: 3/6/2012 12:11:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Good defenders make more fouls then bad ones, i believe even the Bb said it 2-3 month ago.


Can u try to find the quote to this please?

About the game, I don't really get it. I don't like the "bad luck" explanations because, well, they doesn't point out to anything we as managers can do or understand.

This game really puzzles me because even considering, the difference in posesions and FTs this should have been a victory for Black Label considering tactics and matchups.

This Post:
00
210195.31 in reply to 210195.30
Date: 3/6/2012 1:47:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i looked at it, bt i don''t know in which threadt it was posted.

But when you look at good vs worse team stats(really clear games, give uo matches or loopsided NT/BBB games ), normally the fouls ain't that much different and foulprone player tend to get worse since they didn't reach there training minutes so often.

This Post:
00
210195.32 in reply to 210195.30
Date: 3/6/2012 2:10:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I don't like the "bad luck" explanations because, well, they doesn't point out to anything we as managers can do or understand.


I think it was BB-Marin who said some things depend on luck, we can't change that with our choices and it resembles real life, where I agree. I guess we are too accustomed that various computer games let us master them and nothing depends on luck there.
But in real life, you just don't know why Lamar Odom is underperforming with Mavericks or what goes through Gordon's head now in Hornets...or how the hell is Kobe shooting 32 pts/game since he is wearing mask. Or how did the Heat blow a giant lead in last five minutes of a finals game against Dallas.


This Post:
00
210195.33 in reply to 210195.32
Date: 3/6/2012 2:54:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i think Lamar Odom bad stretch could be explained, since the strike and his personal problems really hurt him. With just bad luck, it won't be so many games.

But bad luck often comes into play during a basketball game, Nash/nowe are 90% free throw shooter which doesn't mean that they hit every time 9 free throw when they get 10, they will often hit 10 and sometimes just 6 or 7 ... And this count for every shot the player takes(even when the real shoting percentage is nearly impossible to define). And if you have lot of bad luck in a game you loose, with luck you can beat stronger opponents.

This Post:
00
210195.34 in reply to 210195.33
Date: 3/6/2012 5:08:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
If there weren't luck in this game, good and bad, it would be boring as hell.

This Post:
00
210195.35 in reply to 210195.32
Date: 3/6/2012 11:23:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
I don't like the "bad luck" explanations because, well, they doesn't point out to anything we as managers can do or understand.


I think it was BB-Marin who said some things depend on luck, we can't change that with our choices and it resembles real life, where I agree. I guess we are too accustomed that various computer games let us master them and nothing depends on luck there.


I'm not trying to deny the, sometimes, quite strong random effect on buzzerbeater. Just pointing out that "bad luck" should be the last explanation to be offered, because if you always blame the random factor, there is no room for learning.

Most of the time I see the random factor affecting a few parts of the analisys but here, it seems to be omnipresent in almost every category. When that happens, you have two posible choices: A) Really strong random effect B) You are missing something.

Just trying to think if B is plausible or not.

Last edited by Zero, the Magi. at 3/6/2012 11:25:16 PM

This Post:
11
210195.36 in reply to 210195.24
Date: 3/7/2012 2:16:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
113113
(125704.22)
Does this mean inside shot is a useless skill? Having a big man who commands a double team is one of the keys to getting open jump shots. Having a big man who can finish at the rim means that if one of your guards penetrates, the help defender will be that much slower because he has to worry about the pass as well. Obviously rebounding and defense matter, but I'm talking about offense here since that's the way the question was posed, and the author seems to pretty clearly realize that on defense an inside presence is important.


I think lack of inside power is the biggest problem both for this game and (18624)

Look at this game (18407), similar ratings except Inside Scoring, different result totally.

This Post:
00
210195.37 in reply to 210195.35
Date: 3/7/2012 3:19:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I think we still don't know enough about GE and when we encounter something we can't explain, we blame it on luck, while it could be your PG didn't have enough HA, or the player guarding him had good SB...and you don't see this in match ratings.

Advertisement