BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > income

income

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
90694.27 in reply to 90694.26
Date: 5/20/2009 8:27:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
284284
Im not saying you are wrong on that one. The timing isnt right, for the topicstarter. And who knows, he was bored, or he wasnt.

But why would you say that so suddenly, if the discussion is already running and some nice idears were opted. I just dont get that. Just let it go next time.

No hard feelings. Greets.


Ben je op zoek naar een BB-Buddy die jou alle kneepjes van BB bijbrengt? Neem dan deel aan het Buddy-sytem. Pm mij voor meer info
This Post:
00
90694.28 in reply to 90694.27
Date: 5/20/2009 8:31:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Just let it go next time.

Yes, sir!

This Post:
00
90694.29 in reply to 90694.26
Date: 5/21/2009 1:53:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
I can't understand...

t's a shame how many suggesters don't think twice before posting a suggestion that either doesn't bring anything
....
Its a suggestion after all!!! Its coming up to discuss it, You say its a bad idea, (good ideas come from bad ideas and opposite, this is the heart of "improvement") Thats a negative vote. Where is the shame and the ,so called, madness??

doesn't bring anything to the game

... others do not agree with you. How can you "state" that for a matter that is still being argued? Have we tried it and saw the unbalanceness or you just pressume it will happen?

And bottom linei if its a such bad idea.... why so much discussion?


Last edited by Velerefontis at 5/21/2009 2:04:36 AM

This Post:
00
90694.30 in reply to 90694.29
Date: 5/21/2009 2:10:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
I vote against the idea.

More money will always seem an attractive prospect to the managers, heck even I want more money, but with global injection of weekly income just throws up too many question marks and negative points. If the sole purpose is to 'help' new teams get on their feet then there are other ways to go about it. This one will just increase the inflation rate without anyone gaining anything substantial from it in the long term.

This Post:
00
90694.31 in reply to 90694.30
Date: 5/21/2009 3:21:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
The idea is to help everyone equally. Maupster made an excellent point with a system that will provide both teams profit , not depending on "where do they play", but "what division teams are"...


"Lets say Div III plays against III: x amount is split 50/50 Div II against IV: 70/30. Div I against V 90/10"


.... a formula that will keep the balance.

This Post:
00
90694.32 in reply to 90694.30
Date: 5/21/2009 3:22:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
did you say inflation!!

im low cash and rich on players so i gotta say Yes (to whatever was suggested & providing it is indeed inflationary with no immediate downside to teams beginning with S in Japan)

;-)

This Post:
00
90694.33 in reply to 90694.31
Date: 5/21/2009 3:34:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
The idea is to help everyone equally.


That's where the problem kicks in. Increasing income for everyone might give you more cash and provide the illusion that it is providing you with badly needed 'help for badly run teams. Until you realize that the 1 dollar you save is negated by the one dollar increase in the price of goods. Giving out money is among the most attractive changes to be made, but one that is also saddled with far reaching negative effects.

@ Superfly,

That makes it two of us. ;)

This Post:
00
90694.34 in reply to 90694.33
Date: 5/21/2009 3:51:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
So you say we help... a healthy club and a bad one equally. In that case we are back from where we started... Nothing really changes. No harm. If though a bad runned club fails to change route, sooner or later it will bankrupt. And so the
attractive changes to be made
will remain to the healthy club.... In that case something good happened

Last edited by Velerefontis at 5/21/2009 3:52:30 AM

This Post:
00
90694.35 in reply to 90694.34
Date: 5/21/2009 3:58:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
A healthy club doesn't NEED the changes. So let's not change for the sake of change.
In case misunderstanding still occurs, I'll put it in a concise manner :

- Inflation. There is no gain in the long run.

This Post:
00
90694.36 in reply to 90694.35
Date: 5/21/2009 8:34:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Ok you got me to day it: This is madness!

This Post:
00
90694.37 in reply to 90694.36
Date: 5/21/2009 8:59:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
Thanks for participating...

Advertisement